Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1, ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
$(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
    $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




    Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




    I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
      $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




      Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




      I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
      $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




      Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




      I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.







      linear-algebra vector-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 at 9:49









      José Carlos Santos

      141k19111207




      141k19111207










      asked Nov 16 at 9:40









      Lowly0palace

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000949%2fsuppose-that-u-1-ldots-u-m-v-1-ldots-v-n-is-linearly-independent-prov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 16 at 9:47









                José Carlos Santos

                141k19111207




                141k19111207






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000949%2fsuppose-that-u-1-ldots-u-m-v-1-ldots-v-n-is-linearly-independent-prov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                    How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                    QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater