Hiring Significant Others





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.



She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.



What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
    – P.Manthe
    2 days ago








  • 4




    I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
    – Time4Tea
    11 hours ago

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.



She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.



What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
    – P.Manthe
    2 days ago








  • 4




    I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
    – Time4Tea
    11 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.



She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.



What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.



She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.



What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.







relationships hiring






share|improve this question









New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Kate Gregory

106k40234336




106k40234336






New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 28 at 3:40









Meagan Buccheri

352




352




New contributor




Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
    – P.Manthe
    2 days ago








  • 4




    I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
    – Time4Tea
    11 hours ago














  • 1




    The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
    – P.Manthe
    2 days ago








  • 4




    I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
    – Time4Tea
    11 hours ago








1




1




The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago






The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago






4




4




I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago




I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote













Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend




My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.



If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.






share|improve this answer























  • Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
    – Mawg
    Nov 28 at 11:17










  • Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
    – sevensevens
    Nov 28 at 14:43


















up vote
5
down vote













I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.



If he fails, you do not have a conflict.



If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.



You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.



In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.






share|improve this answer





















  • There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
    – David Thornley
    Nov 28 at 22:55










  • @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
    – PagMax
    Nov 28 at 23:56






  • 1




    @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
    – Edwin Buck
    2 days ago












  • @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
    – PagMax
    2 days ago










  • @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
    – Edwin Buck
    2 days ago


















up vote
1
down vote













You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.



Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.



And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
    – David Thornley
    Nov 28 at 22:59


















up vote
-1
down vote













Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?



Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.




My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.



Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    -4
    down vote













    Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.



    It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.



    If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
    If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.



    If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.



    It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      -5
      down vote













      Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
      You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "423"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: false,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123547%2fhiring-significant-others%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown




















        StackExchange.ready(function () {
        $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
        var showEditor = function() {
        $("#show-editor-button").hide();
        $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
        StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
        };

        var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
        if(useFancy == 'True') {
        var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
        var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
        var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

        $(this).loadPopup({
        url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
        loaded: function(popup) {
        var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
        var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
        var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

        pTitle.text(popupTitle);
        pBody.html(popupBody);
        pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
        }
        })
        } else{
        var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
        if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
        showEditor();
        }
        }
        });
        });






        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        13
        down vote













        Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend




        My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




        Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.



        If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.






        share|improve this answer























        • Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
          – Mawg
          Nov 28 at 11:17










        • Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
          – sevensevens
          Nov 28 at 14:43















        up vote
        13
        down vote













        Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend




        My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




        Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.



        If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.






        share|improve this answer























        • Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
          – Mawg
          Nov 28 at 11:17










        • Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
          – sevensevens
          Nov 28 at 14:43













        up vote
        13
        down vote










        up vote
        13
        down vote









        Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend




        My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




        Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.



        If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.






        share|improve this answer














        Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend




        My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




        Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.



        If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 28 at 18:46

























        answered Nov 28 at 3:51









        sevensevens

        8,13731734




        8,13731734












        • Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
          – Mawg
          Nov 28 at 11:17










        • Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
          – sevensevens
          Nov 28 at 14:43


















        • Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
          – Mawg
          Nov 28 at 11:17










        • Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
          – sevensevens
          Nov 28 at 14:43
















        Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
        – Mawg
        Nov 28 at 11:17




        Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
        – Mawg
        Nov 28 at 11:17












        Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
        – sevensevens
        Nov 28 at 14:43




        Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
        – sevensevens
        Nov 28 at 14:43












        up vote
        5
        down vote













        I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.



        If he fails, you do not have a conflict.



        If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.



        You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.



        In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.






        share|improve this answer





















        • There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:55










        • @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
          – PagMax
          Nov 28 at 23:56






        • 1




          @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago












        • @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
          – PagMax
          2 days ago










        • @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago















        up vote
        5
        down vote













        I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.



        If he fails, you do not have a conflict.



        If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.



        You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.



        In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.






        share|improve this answer





















        • There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:55










        • @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
          – PagMax
          Nov 28 at 23:56






        • 1




          @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago












        • @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
          – PagMax
          2 days ago










        • @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago













        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.



        If he fails, you do not have a conflict.



        If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.



        You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.



        In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.






        share|improve this answer












        I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.



        If he fails, you do not have a conflict.



        If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.



        You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.



        In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 28 at 4:35









        PagMax

        7,85632139




        7,85632139












        • There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:55










        • @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
          – PagMax
          Nov 28 at 23:56






        • 1




          @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago












        • @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
          – PagMax
          2 days ago










        • @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago


















        • There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:55










        • @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
          – PagMax
          Nov 28 at 23:56






        • 1




          @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago












        • @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
          – PagMax
          2 days ago










        • @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
          – Edwin Buck
          2 days ago
















        There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
        – David Thornley
        Nov 28 at 22:55




        There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
        – David Thornley
        Nov 28 at 22:55












        @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
        – PagMax
        Nov 28 at 23:56




        @DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
        – PagMax
        Nov 28 at 23:56




        1




        1




        @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
        – Edwin Buck
        2 days ago






        @PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
        – Edwin Buck
        2 days ago














        @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
        – PagMax
        2 days ago




        @EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
        – PagMax
        2 days ago












        @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
        – Edwin Buck
        2 days ago




        @PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
        – Edwin Buck
        2 days ago










        up vote
        1
        down vote













        You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.



        Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.



        And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.






        share|improve this answer

















        • 2




          Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:59















        up vote
        1
        down vote













        You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.



        Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.



        And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.






        share|improve this answer

















        • 2




          Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:59













        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.



        Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.



        And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.






        share|improve this answer












        You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.



        Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.



        And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 28 at 11:29









        gnasher729

        79.9k34145250




        79.9k34145250








        • 2




          Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:59














        • 2




          Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
          – David Thornley
          Nov 28 at 22:59








        2




        2




        Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
        – David Thornley
        Nov 28 at 22:59




        Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
        – David Thornley
        Nov 28 at 22:59










        up vote
        -1
        down vote













        Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?



        Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.




        My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




        Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.



        Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?






        share|improve this answer



























          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?



          Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.




          My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




          Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.



          Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?



            Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.




            My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




            Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.



            Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?






            share|improve this answer














            Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?



            Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.




            My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.




            Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.



            Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 9 hours ago









            Kate Gregory

            106k40234336




            106k40234336










            answered Nov 28 at 11:13









            Mawg

            3,85011034




            3,85011034






















                up vote
                -4
                down vote













                Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.



                It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.



                If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
                If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.



                If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.



                It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  -4
                  down vote













                  Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.



                  It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.



                  If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
                  If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.



                  If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.



                  It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    -4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    -4
                    down vote









                    Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.



                    It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.



                    If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
                    If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.



                    If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.



                    It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.



                    It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.



                    If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
                    If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.



                    If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.



                    It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 28 at 4:32









                    solarflare

                    5,47321232




                    5,47321232






















                        up vote
                        -5
                        down vote













                        Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
                        You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          -5
                          down vote













                          Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
                          You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            -5
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            -5
                            down vote









                            Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
                            You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.






                            share|improve this answer














                            Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
                            You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 28 at 7:00

























                            answered Nov 28 at 4:23









                            SmallChess

                            1,1633621




                            1,1633621






















                                Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123547%2fhiring-significant-others%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown











                                Popular posts from this blog

                                QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

                                Ивакино (Тотемский район)

                                Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)