Hiring Significant Others
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.
She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.
relationships hiring
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.
She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.
relationships hiring
New contributor
1
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
4
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.
She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.
relationships hiring
New contributor
I work for a very small company: 4 employees including myself. We recently let go of our warehouse person. My customer service mentioned to me her boyfriend was unemployed and still looking for work. I simply replied back that it would be a conflict having her boyfriend work with us and made light of the situation saying it would be awkward if he wasn’t a good employee.
She sent my boss the resume, and my boss forwarded it to me. My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
What do I do now? I don’t want to hire him as i don’t agree with working with significant others. Perhaps if I had a larger group of employees maybe but it would be just the 3 of us most of the time.
relationships hiring
relationships hiring
New contributor
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
Kate Gregory
106k40234336
106k40234336
New contributor
asked Nov 28 at 3:40
Meagan Buccheri
352
352
New contributor
New contributor
1
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
4
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago
add a comment |
1
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
4
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago
1
1
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
4
4
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.
If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.
If he fails, you do not have a conflict.
If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.
You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.
In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.
Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.
And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?
Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.
Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.
It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.
If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.
If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.
It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.
If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.
If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.
If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.
Simply don't interview/hire the boyfriend
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Your boss has your back on this one. Just stick to your guns and hire someone else.
If you feel your current employee would be receptive, you can explain the dangers of working with family or significant others. You're under no obligation to do this, and I'd only do it if you feel your employee would take it well.
edited Nov 28 at 18:46
answered Nov 28 at 3:51
sevensevens
8,13731734
8,13731734
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
add a comment |
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Why the downvote? Sounds like a perfectly cromulent answer to me.
– Mawg
Nov 28 at 11:17
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
Perhaps I should have mentioned many companies have HR rules preventing significant others from working together.
– sevensevens
Nov 28 at 14:43
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.
If he fails, you do not have a conflict.
If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.
You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.
In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.
If he fails, you do not have a conflict.
If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.
You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.
In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.
If he fails, you do not have a conflict.
If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.
You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.
In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.
I think you should interview him and hire ONLY on the basis of his qualifications and interview performance.
If he fails, you do not have a conflict.
If he passes, then may be you should think if it is that important to go by how you feel at the cost of not hiring a good employee and making another employee unhappy.
You can consider making some adjustments to your own reservations and give them a chance that they can work professionally and make a great team.
In summary, do not make a decision either ways based on their relationship with another employee and your own thoughts about whether couple should work together or not. Be objective in your interview process and make a decision which is right for the company without assuming that couples cannot be in the same team.
answered Nov 28 at 4:35
PagMax
7,85632139
7,85632139
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
There are actual reasons not to hire significant others to work in the same place. For example, if they break up, it's likely to suddenly mean they don't cooperate with each other. In the light of that, could you explain why you think it should play no part in the decision?
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:55
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
@DavidThornley these are actual reasons to not hire any human being.. they all can go through some personal or emotional issues effecting work. Why assume negative? Why not instead look at the bright side of having a happy couple working for you
– PagMax
Nov 28 at 23:56
1
1
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@PagMax There are reasons beyond the breakup scenario. For example, if two people in the workplace start conspiring to oust another, it's a lot harder to manage. I worked in a deeply family controlled mid sized business once, children got senior positions without the burden of attending work, divorces created needs to create new departments, marriages meant that new sons-in-law were given roles beyond their capabilities. It's not pretty, but many will align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@EdwinBuck fair point. Hence I am asking OP to decide based on qualifications and not on relationship.
– PagMax
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
@PagMax Even qualified people place their qualified children side-stepping due process of other potentially more qualified personnel (at potentially lower wages). Even qualified people get married, and even qualified people get divorces. Even qualified people skip work when no repercussions can be enforced. Even qualified people tend to align with the people they live with before aligning for the good of the company. I don't see how your focus on "qualification" even addresses the issues being raised.
– Edwin Buck
2 days ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.
Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.
And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.
Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.
And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.
Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.
And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.
You made light of the situation, meanwhile her boyfriend is without money and without a job. I bet “making light” didn’t go down well.
Decide whether employing a couple is a security risk, based on objective criteria, not on your private opinion. Decide whether one of them is responsible to supervise the other and might not do their job properly because of the relationship. If you expect inappropriate behaviour, that’s what probation is ther for. Then tell the customer service person your objective decision, and no jokes please.
And in an interview, you judge that person like you would any other.
answered Nov 28 at 11:29
gnasher729
79.9k34145250
79.9k34145250
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
add a comment |
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
2
2
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
Significant others should never be in a position where one is directly or indirectly reporting to the other. Nobody will be able to figure out whether decisions are based on good or romantic reasons. I'd worry about what would happen if they broke up, which is not something you'll find out about in a probationary period.
– David Thornley
Nov 28 at 22:59
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?
Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.
Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?
Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.
Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?
Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.
Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?
Ask you boss what happens if one of them gets a new job? Does she really want to lose half the workforce at the same time, in such a small company?
Also, while going behind your back is somewhat understandable, it is not acceptable workspace behavio(u)r, and she needs to be told so in no uncertain terms.
My boss has left it up to me to make the decision and had mentioned if she knew I felt that way she would have never agreed to look at the resume.
Either way, your employee has put you in awkward position. You can refuse to interview, or interview and don't offer, but she will still be upset, and your relationship will suffer.
Can you very quickly find and accept another candidate?
edited 9 hours ago
Kate Gregory
106k40234336
106k40234336
answered Nov 28 at 11:13
Mawg
3,85011034
3,85011034
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.
It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.
If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.
If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.
It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.
It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.
If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.
If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.
It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
up vote
-4
down vote
Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.
It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.
If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.
If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.
It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.
Unless you have some policies in place regarding office romances you'll have a hard time justifying not interviewing this guy.
It looks like a lose-lose scenario as it stands.
If you interview him and not hire him you could lose your customer support.
If you don't interview him you might lose her anyway.
If you go ahead and interview and hire him and later change your mind you'll lose your customer support.
It's a sticky situation but your best bet might be to go ahead and hire him and hope for the best.
answered Nov 28 at 4:32
solarflare
5,47321232
5,47321232
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
up vote
-5
down vote
Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.
Refuse to interview the boyfriend. If she causes troubles to you, you also let go of her. By now, you are experienced in the process.
You will then modify the job ad for a more senior position, that the new recruit will have to handle both warehouse and customer service. Something like "Warehouse customer service manager" will do.
edited Nov 28 at 7:00
answered Nov 28 at 4:23
SmallChess
1,1633621
1,1633621
add a comment |
add a comment |
Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Meagan Buccheri is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123547%2fhiring-significant-others%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The personality and the age of the couple is very important. Light-minded young couple are likely to bring a mess into your company. Mature, calm and experienced couple can be even more efficient. Did she really consider the consequences of working with her boyfriend? Most people are not really prepared for that...
– P.Manthe
2 days ago
4
I don't like your edit. Your 1-line question is now too broad (imo) and invalidates many of the answers that have already been given and voted on.
– Time4Tea
11 hours ago