Universal Property of Ext sheaves











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












This is a problem from Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Chapter III Ex.6.4:




Let $X$ be a noetherian scheme, and suppose that every coherent sheaf on $X$ is a quotient of a locally free sheaf. Then for any $mathcal{G} in mathcal{Mod}(X)$, show that the $delta$-functor $mathscr{Ext}^{i}(cdot,mathcal{G})$ from $mathcal{Coh}(X)$ to $mathcal{Mod}(X)$, is a contravariant universal $delta$-functor.




My attempt and failure:



By the hint from this book, we want to show that this $delta$-functor is coeffacable. Now by condition we have a surjection from a locally free sheaf $mathcal{F'}$ to $mathcal{F}$. From Hartshorne's book we know that locally free sheaf of finite rank has vanished higher Ext sheaves, so I want to find a locally free sheaf of finite rank of $mathcal{F'}$. By extension of coherent sheaf we can find a coherent subsheaf of $mathcal{F'}$. But it seems that this sheaf not necessary becomes locally free again, and neither has a vanished higher Ext sheave from a priori.



Any help is appreciated.



Edit: I've thought about that Hartshorne implies the locally free sheaf to have finite rank since he also refers it as "$mathcal{Coh}(X)$ has enough locally frees". If this is the case I appreciate a counter example of the original statement above.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    This is a problem from Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Chapter III Ex.6.4:




    Let $X$ be a noetherian scheme, and suppose that every coherent sheaf on $X$ is a quotient of a locally free sheaf. Then for any $mathcal{G} in mathcal{Mod}(X)$, show that the $delta$-functor $mathscr{Ext}^{i}(cdot,mathcal{G})$ from $mathcal{Coh}(X)$ to $mathcal{Mod}(X)$, is a contravariant universal $delta$-functor.




    My attempt and failure:



    By the hint from this book, we want to show that this $delta$-functor is coeffacable. Now by condition we have a surjection from a locally free sheaf $mathcal{F'}$ to $mathcal{F}$. From Hartshorne's book we know that locally free sheaf of finite rank has vanished higher Ext sheaves, so I want to find a locally free sheaf of finite rank of $mathcal{F'}$. By extension of coherent sheaf we can find a coherent subsheaf of $mathcal{F'}$. But it seems that this sheaf not necessary becomes locally free again, and neither has a vanished higher Ext sheave from a priori.



    Any help is appreciated.



    Edit: I've thought about that Hartshorne implies the locally free sheaf to have finite rank since he also refers it as "$mathcal{Coh}(X)$ has enough locally frees". If this is the case I appreciate a counter example of the original statement above.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      This is a problem from Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Chapter III Ex.6.4:




      Let $X$ be a noetherian scheme, and suppose that every coherent sheaf on $X$ is a quotient of a locally free sheaf. Then for any $mathcal{G} in mathcal{Mod}(X)$, show that the $delta$-functor $mathscr{Ext}^{i}(cdot,mathcal{G})$ from $mathcal{Coh}(X)$ to $mathcal{Mod}(X)$, is a contravariant universal $delta$-functor.




      My attempt and failure:



      By the hint from this book, we want to show that this $delta$-functor is coeffacable. Now by condition we have a surjection from a locally free sheaf $mathcal{F'}$ to $mathcal{F}$. From Hartshorne's book we know that locally free sheaf of finite rank has vanished higher Ext sheaves, so I want to find a locally free sheaf of finite rank of $mathcal{F'}$. By extension of coherent sheaf we can find a coherent subsheaf of $mathcal{F'}$. But it seems that this sheaf not necessary becomes locally free again, and neither has a vanished higher Ext sheave from a priori.



      Any help is appreciated.



      Edit: I've thought about that Hartshorne implies the locally free sheaf to have finite rank since he also refers it as "$mathcal{Coh}(X)$ has enough locally frees". If this is the case I appreciate a counter example of the original statement above.










      share|cite|improve this question















      This is a problem from Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Chapter III Ex.6.4:




      Let $X$ be a noetherian scheme, and suppose that every coherent sheaf on $X$ is a quotient of a locally free sheaf. Then for any $mathcal{G} in mathcal{Mod}(X)$, show that the $delta$-functor $mathscr{Ext}^{i}(cdot,mathcal{G})$ from $mathcal{Coh}(X)$ to $mathcal{Mod}(X)$, is a contravariant universal $delta$-functor.




      My attempt and failure:



      By the hint from this book, we want to show that this $delta$-functor is coeffacable. Now by condition we have a surjection from a locally free sheaf $mathcal{F'}$ to $mathcal{F}$. From Hartshorne's book we know that locally free sheaf of finite rank has vanished higher Ext sheaves, so I want to find a locally free sheaf of finite rank of $mathcal{F'}$. By extension of coherent sheaf we can find a coherent subsheaf of $mathcal{F'}$. But it seems that this sheaf not necessary becomes locally free again, and neither has a vanished higher Ext sheave from a priori.



      Any help is appreciated.



      Edit: I've thought about that Hartshorne implies the locally free sheaf to have finite rank since he also refers it as "$mathcal{Coh}(X)$ has enough locally frees". If this is the case I appreciate a counter example of the original statement above.







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 17 at 21:39

























      asked Nov 17 at 21:28









      hyyyyy

      164




      164



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002826%2funiversal-property-of-ext-sheaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002826%2funiversal-property-of-ext-sheaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater