existence of limit when both RHL and LHL approachees Positive infinity
We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite
But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$
Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.
calculus limits
add a comment |
We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite
But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$
Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.
calculus limits
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
1
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
add a comment |
We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite
But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$
Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.
calculus limits
We know that if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x)=lim_{x to a^-}f(x)=L$$ Then $$lim_{x to a}f(x) =L$$ if $L$ is finite
But if $$lim_{x to a^+}f(x) to +infty$$ and
$$lim_{x to a^-}f(x) to +infty$$
Can we say $$lim_{x to a} f(x)$$ Does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities.
calculus limits
calculus limits
asked Jan 5 '16 at 4:15
Umesh shankar
2,56331219
2,56331219
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
1
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
add a comment |
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
1
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
1
1
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
add a comment |
In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.
When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?
add a comment |
Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?
Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1600433%2fexistence-of-limit-when-both-rhl-and-lhl-approachees-positive-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
add a comment |
Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
add a comment |
Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$
Having $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=infty$$ alone is enough to conclude that the limit does not exist, since otherwise there is a finite $L$ such that $$lim_{x to a} f(x)=L,$$ which implies that $$lim_{x to a^+} f(x)=L.$$
answered Jan 5 '16 at 4:36
zwisch
12
12
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
add a comment |
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
Limits of $pm infty$ can exist.
– zhw.
May 14 '17 at 21:39
add a comment |
In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.
When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?
add a comment |
In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.
When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?
add a comment |
In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.
When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?
In general, we only say a limit 'exists' when it is finite. When we say $lim_{xto a}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta),, f(x)>M tag{1}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large near $a$ — all of $f$. Contrast this with '$f$ attains arbitrarily large value near $a$'.
When we say $lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x>a),, f(x)>Mtag{2}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a right-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
When we say $lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=+infty$ we mean that
$$(forall M>0),(exists delta > 0),(forall x ,text{ with }, 0<|x-a|<delta,text{ and }, x<a),, f(x)>Mtag{3}$$
In other words, $f$ becomes arbitrarily large in a left-neighborhood of $a$ — all of $f$, once again.
Can you see how statements $(2)$ and $(3)$, combined, imply statement $(1)$?
answered Nov 6 '17 at 14:18
Fimpellizieri
17.2k11836
17.2k11836
add a comment |
add a comment |
Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?
Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.
add a comment |
Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?
Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.
add a comment |
Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?
Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.
Can we say $lim limits_{xrightarrow a}f(x)$ does not exists since we cannot compare two infinities?
Yes, we can say that it does not exist at a point $a$ because plus and minus infinities are different behaviors (function growing without bound/decreasing without bound). Moreover, limits of functions that end up in plus or minus infinity actually do not exist either. However, we do write that a limit is equal to $pminfty$, but that's only done for the purposes of describing the way a function behaves. It's just supposed to be more informative that way, meaning it gives us more information about a function's behavior near a particular point.
edited Nov 6 '17 at 14:40
answered Nov 6 '17 at 14:34
Mike R.
1,339212
1,339212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1600433%2fexistence-of-limit-when-both-rhl-and-lhl-approachees-positive-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What do you mean "we cannot compare two infinities"? The statement $lim_{x to a} f(x) = infty$ is defined in terms of lower bounds of a function.
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:17
what i mean is if $L$ is finite $L-L=0$, but if $L$ is $infty$, $infty-infty $ is indeterminate. Hence can we say Limit DNE?
– Umesh shankar
Jan 5 '16 at 4:19
1
No, the limit is equal to infinity. How would subtraction be involved?
– T. Bongers
Jan 5 '16 at 4:20