AR(1) to Ornstein-Uhlenbeck for AR(1) process of the form $ln z_{t+1}=rho ln z_t+sigma...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have the AR(1) process of the following form:



$$ln z_{t+1}=rho ln z_t+sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}epsilon_t$$



And need to find its continous time corresponding Ornstein-Uhlenbeckprocess.



I have the info that an AR(1) can be translated to an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck as follows:
$$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)dt+sigma dW tag{O-U}$$
$$x_{t+1}=thetabar{x}+(1-theta)x_t +sigmaepsilon_ttag{AR(1)}$$
but fail to see how to apply this to this specific case. I have looked at other answers considering the translation between AR(1) and OU, but again do not clearly see it for this specific form.



Any help is highly appreciated :-)



edit:
Using the answer below and a linear approximation of $e^{-theta Delta}approx1-theta Delta$ and setting $Delta=1$ I get
$$dln z_t=-(1-rho) ln z_t +sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}dW_t$$
which corresponds to the approximation as given by (AR(1))










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I have the AR(1) process of the following form:



    $$ln z_{t+1}=rho ln z_t+sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}epsilon_t$$



    And need to find its continous time corresponding Ornstein-Uhlenbeckprocess.



    I have the info that an AR(1) can be translated to an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck as follows:
    $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)dt+sigma dW tag{O-U}$$
    $$x_{t+1}=thetabar{x}+(1-theta)x_t +sigmaepsilon_ttag{AR(1)}$$
    but fail to see how to apply this to this specific case. I have looked at other answers considering the translation between AR(1) and OU, but again do not clearly see it for this specific form.



    Any help is highly appreciated :-)



    edit:
    Using the answer below and a linear approximation of $e^{-theta Delta}approx1-theta Delta$ and setting $Delta=1$ I get
    $$dln z_t=-(1-rho) ln z_t +sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}dW_t$$
    which corresponds to the approximation as given by (AR(1))










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I have the AR(1) process of the following form:



      $$ln z_{t+1}=rho ln z_t+sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}epsilon_t$$



      And need to find its continous time corresponding Ornstein-Uhlenbeckprocess.



      I have the info that an AR(1) can be translated to an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck as follows:
      $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)dt+sigma dW tag{O-U}$$
      $$x_{t+1}=thetabar{x}+(1-theta)x_t +sigmaepsilon_ttag{AR(1)}$$
      but fail to see how to apply this to this specific case. I have looked at other answers considering the translation between AR(1) and OU, but again do not clearly see it for this specific form.



      Any help is highly appreciated :-)



      edit:
      Using the answer below and a linear approximation of $e^{-theta Delta}approx1-theta Delta$ and setting $Delta=1$ I get
      $$dln z_t=-(1-rho) ln z_t +sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}dW_t$$
      which corresponds to the approximation as given by (AR(1))










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have the AR(1) process of the following form:



      $$ln z_{t+1}=rho ln z_t+sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}epsilon_t$$



      And need to find its continous time corresponding Ornstein-Uhlenbeckprocess.



      I have the info that an AR(1) can be translated to an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck as follows:
      $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)dt+sigma dW tag{O-U}$$
      $$x_{t+1}=thetabar{x}+(1-theta)x_t +sigmaepsilon_ttag{AR(1)}$$
      but fail to see how to apply this to this specific case. I have looked at other answers considering the translation between AR(1) and OU, but again do not clearly see it for this specific form.



      Any help is highly appreciated :-)



      edit:
      Using the answer below and a linear approximation of $e^{-theta Delta}approx1-theta Delta$ and setting $Delta=1$ I get
      $$dln z_t=-(1-rho) ln z_t +sigma sqrt{(1-rho^2)}dW_t$$
      which corresponds to the approximation as given by (AR(1))







      stochastic-processes vector-auto-regression






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago

























      asked yesterday









      user469216

      567




      567






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          We can solve



          $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)ds+sigma dW_s $$



          by multiplying by an integrating factor $e^{theta s}$ and integrating over $[t,t+Delta]$ to obtain



          $$e^{theta(t+Delta)}x(t + Delta) - e^{theta t}x(t) = bar{x} ( e^{theta(t + Delta)}- e^{theta t}) + sigmaint_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta s}, dW_s$$



          Rearranging we get,



          $$tag{*}x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + underbrace{sigma e^{-theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta(s- t)}, dW_s}_{I(t,Delta)}$$



          The moments of the stochastic integral on the RHS are



          $$mathbb{E}left(I(t, Delta) right) = 0, \ varleft(I(t, Delta) right)= sigma^2 e^{-2theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{2theta(s- t)}, ds = frac{sigma^2(1 - e^{-2theta Delta})}{2 theta}$$



          Thus, we can write (*) as



          $$x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}xi,$$



          where $xi sim N(0,1)$ is a standard normal random variable.



          Making the association with your AR(1) process we have



          $$x(t+Delta) iff ln z_{t+1} quad x(t) iff ln z_t, \ bar{x} = 0, quad rho = e^{-theta Delta}, quad sigmasqrt{1- rho^2} iff sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}$$



          So the continuous time process is



          $$d ln z_t = frac{ln rho}{Delta}ln z_t ,dt + sigma sqrt{frac{-ln rho}{Delta}} , dW_t$$



          where $Delta$ is the time interval between sampled observations.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
            – user469216
            yesterday










          • It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
            – RRL
            yesterday








          • 1




            The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
            – RRL
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998471%2far1-to-ornstein-uhlenbeck-for-ar1-process-of-the-form-ln-z-t1-rho-ln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          We can solve



          $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)ds+sigma dW_s $$



          by multiplying by an integrating factor $e^{theta s}$ and integrating over $[t,t+Delta]$ to obtain



          $$e^{theta(t+Delta)}x(t + Delta) - e^{theta t}x(t) = bar{x} ( e^{theta(t + Delta)}- e^{theta t}) + sigmaint_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta s}, dW_s$$



          Rearranging we get,



          $$tag{*}x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + underbrace{sigma e^{-theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta(s- t)}, dW_s}_{I(t,Delta)}$$



          The moments of the stochastic integral on the RHS are



          $$mathbb{E}left(I(t, Delta) right) = 0, \ varleft(I(t, Delta) right)= sigma^2 e^{-2theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{2theta(s- t)}, ds = frac{sigma^2(1 - e^{-2theta Delta})}{2 theta}$$



          Thus, we can write (*) as



          $$x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}xi,$$



          where $xi sim N(0,1)$ is a standard normal random variable.



          Making the association with your AR(1) process we have



          $$x(t+Delta) iff ln z_{t+1} quad x(t) iff ln z_t, \ bar{x} = 0, quad rho = e^{-theta Delta}, quad sigmasqrt{1- rho^2} iff sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}$$



          So the continuous time process is



          $$d ln z_t = frac{ln rho}{Delta}ln z_t ,dt + sigma sqrt{frac{-ln rho}{Delta}} , dW_t$$



          where $Delta$ is the time interval between sampled observations.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
            – user469216
            yesterday










          • It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
            – RRL
            yesterday








          • 1




            The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
            – RRL
            yesterday















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          We can solve



          $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)ds+sigma dW_s $$



          by multiplying by an integrating factor $e^{theta s}$ and integrating over $[t,t+Delta]$ to obtain



          $$e^{theta(t+Delta)}x(t + Delta) - e^{theta t}x(t) = bar{x} ( e^{theta(t + Delta)}- e^{theta t}) + sigmaint_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta s}, dW_s$$



          Rearranging we get,



          $$tag{*}x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + underbrace{sigma e^{-theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta(s- t)}, dW_s}_{I(t,Delta)}$$



          The moments of the stochastic integral on the RHS are



          $$mathbb{E}left(I(t, Delta) right) = 0, \ varleft(I(t, Delta) right)= sigma^2 e^{-2theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{2theta(s- t)}, ds = frac{sigma^2(1 - e^{-2theta Delta})}{2 theta}$$



          Thus, we can write (*) as



          $$x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}xi,$$



          where $xi sim N(0,1)$ is a standard normal random variable.



          Making the association with your AR(1) process we have



          $$x(t+Delta) iff ln z_{t+1} quad x(t) iff ln z_t, \ bar{x} = 0, quad rho = e^{-theta Delta}, quad sigmasqrt{1- rho^2} iff sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}$$



          So the continuous time process is



          $$d ln z_t = frac{ln rho}{Delta}ln z_t ,dt + sigma sqrt{frac{-ln rho}{Delta}} , dW_t$$



          where $Delta$ is the time interval between sampled observations.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
            – user469216
            yesterday










          • It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
            – RRL
            yesterday








          • 1




            The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
            – RRL
            yesterday













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          We can solve



          $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)ds+sigma dW_s $$



          by multiplying by an integrating factor $e^{theta s}$ and integrating over $[t,t+Delta]$ to obtain



          $$e^{theta(t+Delta)}x(t + Delta) - e^{theta t}x(t) = bar{x} ( e^{theta(t + Delta)}- e^{theta t}) + sigmaint_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta s}, dW_s$$



          Rearranging we get,



          $$tag{*}x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + underbrace{sigma e^{-theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta(s- t)}, dW_s}_{I(t,Delta)}$$



          The moments of the stochastic integral on the RHS are



          $$mathbb{E}left(I(t, Delta) right) = 0, \ varleft(I(t, Delta) right)= sigma^2 e^{-2theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{2theta(s- t)}, ds = frac{sigma^2(1 - e^{-2theta Delta})}{2 theta}$$



          Thus, we can write (*) as



          $$x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}xi,$$



          where $xi sim N(0,1)$ is a standard normal random variable.



          Making the association with your AR(1) process we have



          $$x(t+Delta) iff ln z_{t+1} quad x(t) iff ln z_t, \ bar{x} = 0, quad rho = e^{-theta Delta}, quad sigmasqrt{1- rho^2} iff sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}$$



          So the continuous time process is



          $$d ln z_t = frac{ln rho}{Delta}ln z_t ,dt + sigma sqrt{frac{-ln rho}{Delta}} , dW_t$$



          where $Delta$ is the time interval between sampled observations.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          We can solve



          $$dx=theta(bar{x}-x)ds+sigma dW_s $$



          by multiplying by an integrating factor $e^{theta s}$ and integrating over $[t,t+Delta]$ to obtain



          $$e^{theta(t+Delta)}x(t + Delta) - e^{theta t}x(t) = bar{x} ( e^{theta(t + Delta)}- e^{theta t}) + sigmaint_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta s}, dW_s$$



          Rearranging we get,



          $$tag{*}x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + underbrace{sigma e^{-theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{theta(s- t)}, dW_s}_{I(t,Delta)}$$



          The moments of the stochastic integral on the RHS are



          $$mathbb{E}left(I(t, Delta) right) = 0, \ varleft(I(t, Delta) right)= sigma^2 e^{-2theta Delta}int_t^{t + Delta} e^{2theta(s- t)}, ds = frac{sigma^2(1 - e^{-2theta Delta})}{2 theta}$$



          Thus, we can write (*) as



          $$x(t + Delta) =bar{x}(1 - e^{-theta Delta}) + e^{-theta Delta}x(t) + sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}xi,$$



          where $xi sim N(0,1)$ is a standard normal random variable.



          Making the association with your AR(1) process we have



          $$x(t+Delta) iff ln z_{t+1} quad x(t) iff ln z_t, \ bar{x} = 0, quad rho = e^{-theta Delta}, quad sigmasqrt{1- rho^2} iff sigmasqrt{frac{1 - e^{-2theta Delta}}{2theta}}$$



          So the continuous time process is



          $$d ln z_t = frac{ln rho}{Delta}ln z_t ,dt + sigma sqrt{frac{-ln rho}{Delta}} , dW_t$$



          where $Delta$ is the time interval between sampled observations.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          RRL

          46.4k42365




          46.4k42365












          • just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
            – user469216
            yesterday










          • It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
            – RRL
            yesterday








          • 1




            The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
            – RRL
            yesterday


















          • just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
            – user469216
            yesterday










          • It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
            – RRL
            yesterday






          • 1




            So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
            – RRL
            yesterday








          • 1




            The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
            – RRL
            yesterday
















          just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
          – user469216
          yesterday




          just for notational consistency, how would you get rid of $Delta$ so that I only have "dt" terms?
          – user469216
          yesterday












          It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
          – RRL
          yesterday




          It's just a matter of using a dimensionless time variable $hat{t} = t/Delta$
          – RRL
          yesterday




          1




          1




          Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
          – RRL
          yesterday




          Or I could have integrated the SDE over the interval $[t,t+1]$ and it goes away.
          – RRL
          yesterday




          1




          1




          So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
          – RRL
          yesterday






          So I left out the $dt$ in the answer by mistake -- I now added it.Clearly you can see how $Delta$ can be absorbed into the time variable. Also the Wiener process is $mathcal{O}(dt)$ which is why the $sqrt{Delta}$ shows up as a coefficient. Short answer -- just set $Delta = 1$.
          – RRL
          yesterday






          1




          1




          The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
          – RRL
          yesterday




          The OU and AR(1) you wrote with the same parameters $theta$ and $sigma$ appearing in both is only correct if the spacing between discrete steps is the same as the time unit for $t$, e.g. 1 year.
          – RRL
          yesterday


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998471%2far1-to-ornstein-uhlenbeck-for-ar1-process-of-the-form-ln-z-t1-rho-ln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Актюбинская область

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure