How to understand the grammar of “the many lamps” in this context?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
5
down vote

favorite













Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




-- From Harry Potter



As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. For example, I've seen "many people", but not "the many people". So, "the many lamps" here looks odd to me. How should we interpret it in this case? Or my understanding for this part of the grammar is plain wrong?










share|improve this question
























  • I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
    – Raimund Krämer
    yesterday










  • Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
    – Jonas Bezzubovas
    yesterday












  • @dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
    – Barmar
    yesterday






  • 4




    As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
    – Jim Balter
    yesterday








  • 3




    @Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
    – J.R.
    17 hours ago



















up vote
5
down vote

favorite













Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




-- From Harry Potter



As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. For example, I've seen "many people", but not "the many people". So, "the many lamps" here looks odd to me. How should we interpret it in this case? Or my understanding for this part of the grammar is plain wrong?










share|improve this question
























  • I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
    – Raimund Krämer
    yesterday










  • Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
    – Jonas Bezzubovas
    yesterday












  • @dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
    – Barmar
    yesterday






  • 4




    As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
    – Jim Balter
    yesterday








  • 3




    @Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
    – J.R.
    17 hours ago















up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




-- From Harry Potter



As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. For example, I've seen "many people", but not "the many people". So, "the many lamps" here looks odd to me. How should we interpret it in this case? Or my understanding for this part of the grammar is plain wrong?










share|improve this question
















Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




-- From Harry Potter



As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. For example, I've seen "many people", but not "the many people". So, "the many lamps" here looks odd to me. How should we interpret it in this case? Or my understanding for this part of the grammar is plain wrong?







articles definite-article






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 23 hours ago









CJ Dennis

1,733716




1,733716










asked yesterday









dan

3,40822257




3,40822257












  • I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
    – Raimund Krämer
    yesterday










  • Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
    – Jonas Bezzubovas
    yesterday












  • @dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
    – Barmar
    yesterday






  • 4




    As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
    – Jim Balter
    yesterday








  • 3




    @Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
    – J.R.
    17 hours ago




















  • I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
    – Raimund Krämer
    yesterday










  • Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
    – Jonas Bezzubovas
    yesterday












  • @dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
    – Barmar
    yesterday






  • 4




    As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
    – Jim Balter
    yesterday








  • 3




    @Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
    – J.R.
    17 hours ago


















I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
– Raimund Krämer
yesterday




I have not heard of the rule from your first sentence. Do you have a source for it? Also I do not know why your counter example would be incorrect.
– Raimund Krämer
yesterday












Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
– Jonas Bezzubovas
yesterday






Everyone took their seats at the table, the chairs were all aligned, and the many people were eager to sit down. (works grammatically but replace 'people' with 'guests' or something less generic)
– Jonas Bezzubovas
yesterday














@dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
– Barmar
yesterday




@dan I haven't read it myself, but it seems like HP is heavy on dialect, so it's not a good way to learn standard English. It's like trying to learn modern English by reading Pride and Prejudice.
– Barmar
yesterday




4




4




As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
– Jim Balter
yesterday






As I know, when 'many' precedes a noun word, we can not add the definite article 'the'. -- Where did you get that idea? Here, "many" is an adjective, no different from "the red lamps". It's a synonym for "numerous", e.g., "the numerous lamps" means the the same thing (but is less poetic).
– Jim Balter
yesterday






3




3




@Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
– J.R.
17 hours ago






@Barmar - Or maybe that makes the Potter series an especially good source for learning English? (It apparently does a good job of debunking prior misconceptions with counterexamples.)
– J.R.
17 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
20
down vote



accepted










Let's get rid of "many" and see what happens.




Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




This wouldn't make any sense without "the", since it wouldn't specify which lamps were being talked about. With "the", it's clear: all the lamps in the room.



Now we want to add that there are a lot of lamps in the room. We are trying to say that the lamps have the property of being "many", so we use "many" as an adjective. If we still keep the word "the", we're still talking about all the lamps in the room.



Now we could drop the word "the", and the sentence would still make sense, however it would have a slightly different meaning.




Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




This version says that there were a lot of lamps draped with scarves. But it's no longer clear that we're talking about all the lamps in the room. There could be some other lamps that weren't draped with dark red scarves, and in fact this wording suggests that there were (just as saying "many people like Harry Potter" suggests that some people don't).






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
    – Jim Balter
    yesterday




















up vote
12
down vote













In fact, we can use the before many. When we say I have seen many people, we don't mean anyone in particular, but just state the fact that we have seen a lot of people (and it doesn't matter who exactly).



The many lamps means the writer is referring to some particular lamps she has mentioned before, or the context makes it clear (which I think is the case).



Here are a few more sentences with the + many:




In these 50 years, our peacekeepers have continued to provide peace to the many people suffering the ravages of war and violence.



Most important, recognition is due to the many people of Fiji who worked tirelessly towards the restoration of democracy.



Great importance must be attached to the need to protect the basic rights of the many people involved, whether by legal means or on humanitarian grounds.




In each of the sentences above we can use "those numerous people" instead of "the many people." Note that every time we say "the many people," it's clear who we are talking about.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    It's exactly the same as "the five lamps" except that there weren't just five – there were many.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      many can serve as a determiner or as an adjective (or as a pronoun but that's not relevant to your question).




      Many people keep dogs as pets.



      Of the many people who keep dogs as pets, quite a few also have cats.



      Quite a few of the many people who keep dogs as pets also have cats.







      share|improve this answer





















      • Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
        – dan
        yesterday








      • 1




        @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
        – Jim Balter
        yesterday








      • 1




        @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
        – mcalex
        20 hours ago








      • 1




        @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
        14 hours ago












      • @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
        13 hours ago













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185579%2fhow-to-understand-the-grammar-of-the-many-lamps-in-this-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      20
      down vote



      accepted










      Let's get rid of "many" and see what happens.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This wouldn't make any sense without "the", since it wouldn't specify which lamps were being talked about. With "the", it's clear: all the lamps in the room.



      Now we want to add that there are a lot of lamps in the room. We are trying to say that the lamps have the property of being "many", so we use "many" as an adjective. If we still keep the word "the", we're still talking about all the lamps in the room.



      Now we could drop the word "the", and the sentence would still make sense, however it would have a slightly different meaning.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This version says that there were a lot of lamps draped with scarves. But it's no longer clear that we're talking about all the lamps in the room. There could be some other lamps that weren't draped with dark red scarves, and in fact this wording suggests that there were (just as saying "many people like Harry Potter" suggests that some people don't).






      share|improve this answer

















      • 7




        Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
        – Jim Balter
        yesterday

















      up vote
      20
      down vote



      accepted










      Let's get rid of "many" and see what happens.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This wouldn't make any sense without "the", since it wouldn't specify which lamps were being talked about. With "the", it's clear: all the lamps in the room.



      Now we want to add that there are a lot of lamps in the room. We are trying to say that the lamps have the property of being "many", so we use "many" as an adjective. If we still keep the word "the", we're still talking about all the lamps in the room.



      Now we could drop the word "the", and the sentence would still make sense, however it would have a slightly different meaning.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This version says that there were a lot of lamps draped with scarves. But it's no longer clear that we're talking about all the lamps in the room. There could be some other lamps that weren't draped with dark red scarves, and in fact this wording suggests that there were (just as saying "many people like Harry Potter" suggests that some people don't).






      share|improve this answer

















      • 7




        Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
        – Jim Balter
        yesterday















      up vote
      20
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      20
      down vote



      accepted






      Let's get rid of "many" and see what happens.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This wouldn't make any sense without "the", since it wouldn't specify which lamps were being talked about. With "the", it's clear: all the lamps in the room.



      Now we want to add that there are a lot of lamps in the room. We are trying to say that the lamps have the property of being "many", so we use "many" as an adjective. If we still keep the word "the", we're still talking about all the lamps in the room.



      Now we could drop the word "the", and the sentence would still make sense, however it would have a slightly different meaning.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This version says that there were a lot of lamps draped with scarves. But it's no longer clear that we're talking about all the lamps in the room. There could be some other lamps that weren't draped with dark red scarves, and in fact this wording suggests that there were (just as saying "many people like Harry Potter" suggests that some people don't).






      share|improve this answer












      Let's get rid of "many" and see what happens.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and the lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This wouldn't make any sense without "the", since it wouldn't specify which lamps were being talked about. With "the", it's clear: all the lamps in the room.



      Now we want to add that there are a lot of lamps in the room. We are trying to say that the lamps have the property of being "many", so we use "many" as an adjective. If we still keep the word "the", we're still talking about all the lamps in the room.



      Now we could drop the word "the", and the sentence would still make sense, however it would have a slightly different meaning.




      Everything was lit with a dim, crimson light; the curtains at the windows were all closed, and many lamps were draped with dark red scarves.




      This version says that there were a lot of lamps draped with scarves. But it's no longer clear that we're talking about all the lamps in the room. There could be some other lamps that weren't draped with dark red scarves, and in fact this wording suggests that there were (just as saying "many people like Harry Potter" suggests that some people don't).







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      Especially Lime

      1,08628




      1,08628








      • 7




        Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
        – Jim Balter
        yesterday
















      • 7




        Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
        – Jim Balter
        yesterday










      7




      7




      Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
      – Jim Balter
      yesterday






      Things are a little bit more tricky than this. If we say "lamps were draped", that's some lamps. "the lamps" is all lamps. "red lamps" is some red lamps. "the red lamps" is all red lamps. But ... "many lamps" is some lamps, and "the many lamps" is all lamps, so "many" is different from "red" in that it doesn't filter out anything, it only characterizes the number of lamps. Now consider "the pretty lamps" ... that could filter out ugly lamps, but more likely it characterizes all the lamps as pretty. This is ambiguous and it takes judgment and context to determine the exact meaning.
      – Jim Balter
      yesterday














      up vote
      12
      down vote













      In fact, we can use the before many. When we say I have seen many people, we don't mean anyone in particular, but just state the fact that we have seen a lot of people (and it doesn't matter who exactly).



      The many lamps means the writer is referring to some particular lamps she has mentioned before, or the context makes it clear (which I think is the case).



      Here are a few more sentences with the + many:




      In these 50 years, our peacekeepers have continued to provide peace to the many people suffering the ravages of war and violence.



      Most important, recognition is due to the many people of Fiji who worked tirelessly towards the restoration of democracy.



      Great importance must be attached to the need to protect the basic rights of the many people involved, whether by legal means or on humanitarian grounds.




      In each of the sentences above we can use "those numerous people" instead of "the many people." Note that every time we say "the many people," it's clear who we are talking about.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        12
        down vote













        In fact, we can use the before many. When we say I have seen many people, we don't mean anyone in particular, but just state the fact that we have seen a lot of people (and it doesn't matter who exactly).



        The many lamps means the writer is referring to some particular lamps she has mentioned before, or the context makes it clear (which I think is the case).



        Here are a few more sentences with the + many:




        In these 50 years, our peacekeepers have continued to provide peace to the many people suffering the ravages of war and violence.



        Most important, recognition is due to the many people of Fiji who worked tirelessly towards the restoration of democracy.



        Great importance must be attached to the need to protect the basic rights of the many people involved, whether by legal means or on humanitarian grounds.




        In each of the sentences above we can use "those numerous people" instead of "the many people." Note that every time we say "the many people," it's clear who we are talking about.






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          12
          down vote










          up vote
          12
          down vote









          In fact, we can use the before many. When we say I have seen many people, we don't mean anyone in particular, but just state the fact that we have seen a lot of people (and it doesn't matter who exactly).



          The many lamps means the writer is referring to some particular lamps she has mentioned before, or the context makes it clear (which I think is the case).



          Here are a few more sentences with the + many:




          In these 50 years, our peacekeepers have continued to provide peace to the many people suffering the ravages of war and violence.



          Most important, recognition is due to the many people of Fiji who worked tirelessly towards the restoration of democracy.



          Great importance must be attached to the need to protect the basic rights of the many people involved, whether by legal means or on humanitarian grounds.




          In each of the sentences above we can use "those numerous people" instead of "the many people." Note that every time we say "the many people," it's clear who we are talking about.






          share|improve this answer














          In fact, we can use the before many. When we say I have seen many people, we don't mean anyone in particular, but just state the fact that we have seen a lot of people (and it doesn't matter who exactly).



          The many lamps means the writer is referring to some particular lamps she has mentioned before, or the context makes it clear (which I think is the case).



          Here are a few more sentences with the + many:




          In these 50 years, our peacekeepers have continued to provide peace to the many people suffering the ravages of war and violence.



          Most important, recognition is due to the many people of Fiji who worked tirelessly towards the restoration of democracy.



          Great importance must be attached to the need to protect the basic rights of the many people involved, whether by legal means or on humanitarian grounds.




          In each of the sentences above we can use "those numerous people" instead of "the many people." Note that every time we say "the many people," it's clear who we are talking about.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          Enguroo

          2,393224




          2,393224






















              up vote
              5
              down vote













              It's exactly the same as "the five lamps" except that there weren't just five – there were many.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                5
                down vote













                It's exactly the same as "the five lamps" except that there weren't just five – there were many.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote









                  It's exactly the same as "the five lamps" except that there weren't just five – there were many.






                  share|improve this answer












                  It's exactly the same as "the five lamps" except that there weren't just five – there were many.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  David Richerby

                  6,5881739




                  6,5881739






















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      many can serve as a determiner or as an adjective (or as a pronoun but that's not relevant to your question).




                      Many people keep dogs as pets.



                      Of the many people who keep dogs as pets, quite a few also have cats.



                      Quite a few of the many people who keep dogs as pets also have cats.







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                        – dan
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                        – Jim Balter
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                        – mcalex
                        20 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        14 hours ago












                      • @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        13 hours ago

















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      many can serve as a determiner or as an adjective (or as a pronoun but that's not relevant to your question).




                      Many people keep dogs as pets.



                      Of the many people who keep dogs as pets, quite a few also have cats.



                      Quite a few of the many people who keep dogs as pets also have cats.







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                        – dan
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                        – Jim Balter
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                        – mcalex
                        20 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        14 hours ago












                      • @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        13 hours ago















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote









                      many can serve as a determiner or as an adjective (or as a pronoun but that's not relevant to your question).




                      Many people keep dogs as pets.



                      Of the many people who keep dogs as pets, quite a few also have cats.



                      Quite a few of the many people who keep dogs as pets also have cats.







                      share|improve this answer












                      many can serve as a determiner or as an adjective (or as a pronoun but that's not relevant to your question).




                      Many people keep dogs as pets.



                      Of the many people who keep dogs as pets, quite a few also have cats.



                      Quite a few of the many people who keep dogs as pets also have cats.








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered yesterday









                      Tᴚoɯɐuo

                      102k676167




                      102k676167












                      • Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                        – dan
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                        – Jim Balter
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                        – mcalex
                        20 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        14 hours ago












                      • @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        13 hours ago




















                      • Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                        – dan
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                        – Jim Balter
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                        – mcalex
                        20 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        14 hours ago












                      • @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                        – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                        13 hours ago


















                      Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                      – dan
                      yesterday






                      Can other determiners like some, much and etc work with 'the' as well? Can they be adjective too? May we say : the much water, the some students?
                      – dan
                      yesterday






                      1




                      1




                      @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                      – Jim Balter
                      yesterday






                      @dan no, "the some" is not valid. “the many" or “the few", yes; “the some" or “the all", no. "the much" can be used in limited circumstances when it acts like a noun, as in "the much he knew about grammar still wasn't enough to make sense of the sentence".
                      – Jim Balter
                      yesterday






                      1




                      1




                      @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                      – mcalex
                      20 hours ago






                      @Tᴚoɯɐuo In your first example is there any way you could add 'the' before 'many'?
                      – mcalex
                      20 hours ago






                      1




                      1




                      @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                      – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                      14 hours ago






                      @dan: You can say "The little water we had would run out in a week."
                      – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                      14 hours ago














                      @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                      – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                      13 hours ago






                      @mcalex: Assuming you had already mentioned those people, yes, you could, although it could sound a little "forced". There were many people living on the street in cardboard boxes. They had no running water. If you substitute the many people for they it would be a departure from the normal and the usual, which doesn't make it ungrammatical but causes it to stand out. It wouldn't sound conversational but literary and to some ears it might seem like a non-native was speaking.
                      – Tᴚoɯɐuo
                      13 hours ago




















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185579%2fhow-to-understand-the-grammar-of-the-many-lamps-in-this-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Актюбинская область

                      QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

                      AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure