hypergeometric function with special Pochhammer symbol
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What is the relationship between these two hypergeometric functions? Can the following function be written as another function of some hypergeometric functions ?
$$1F1(a+b,2a,x)$$ and $$1F1(a+b,a,x)$$ Can I convert 'a' to '2a'?
hypergeometric-function
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What is the relationship between these two hypergeometric functions? Can the following function be written as another function of some hypergeometric functions ?
$$1F1(a+b,2a,x)$$ and $$1F1(a+b,a,x)$$ Can I convert 'a' to '2a'?
hypergeometric-function
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What is the relationship between these two hypergeometric functions? Can the following function be written as another function of some hypergeometric functions ?
$$1F1(a+b,2a,x)$$ and $$1F1(a+b,a,x)$$ Can I convert 'a' to '2a'?
hypergeometric-function
What is the relationship between these two hypergeometric functions? Can the following function be written as another function of some hypergeometric functions ?
$$1F1(a+b,2a,x)$$ and $$1F1(a+b,a,x)$$ Can I convert 'a' to '2a'?
hypergeometric-function
hypergeometric-function
edited Nov 17 at 21:54
Jean Marie
28.1k41848
28.1k41848
asked Nov 16 at 6:53
Dana
115
115
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21
|
show 6 more comments
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21
|
show 6 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
We have that
$$
{}_1F_1 (a + b,2a,x) = sumlimits_{0, le ,k} {{{left( {a + b} right)^{,overline {,k,} } } over {left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } }}{{x^{,k} } over {k!}}}
$$
where the exponent overlined is a way to indicate the Rising Factorial or Pochammer symbol.
Now, the denominator equals
$$
eqalign{
& left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = prodlimits_{0, le ,j, le ,k - 1} {left( {2a + j} right)} = cr
& = prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {2a + 2j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {2a + 1 + 2j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {a + j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {a + 1/2 + j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} a^{,overline {,leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil ,} } left( {a + 1/2} right)^{,overline {,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor ,} } cr}
$$
or, alternatively
$$
left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k + a - a,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {, - a,} } left( a right)^{,overline {,k + a,} }
$$
In both versions it is not possible to simply relate the above results with $a^{,overline {,k ,} }$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
We have that
$$
{}_1F_1 (a + b,2a,x) = sumlimits_{0, le ,k} {{{left( {a + b} right)^{,overline {,k,} } } over {left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } }}{{x^{,k} } over {k!}}}
$$
where the exponent overlined is a way to indicate the Rising Factorial or Pochammer symbol.
Now, the denominator equals
$$
eqalign{
& left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = prodlimits_{0, le ,j, le ,k - 1} {left( {2a + j} right)} = cr
& = prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {2a + 2j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {2a + 1 + 2j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {a + j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {a + 1/2 + j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} a^{,overline {,leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil ,} } left( {a + 1/2} right)^{,overline {,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor ,} } cr}
$$
or, alternatively
$$
left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k + a - a,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {, - a,} } left( a right)^{,overline {,k + a,} }
$$
In both versions it is not possible to simply relate the above results with $a^{,overline {,k ,} }$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
We have that
$$
{}_1F_1 (a + b,2a,x) = sumlimits_{0, le ,k} {{{left( {a + b} right)^{,overline {,k,} } } over {left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } }}{{x^{,k} } over {k!}}}
$$
where the exponent overlined is a way to indicate the Rising Factorial or Pochammer symbol.
Now, the denominator equals
$$
eqalign{
& left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = prodlimits_{0, le ,j, le ,k - 1} {left( {2a + j} right)} = cr
& = prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {2a + 2j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {2a + 1 + 2j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {a + j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {a + 1/2 + j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} a^{,overline {,leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil ,} } left( {a + 1/2} right)^{,overline {,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor ,} } cr}
$$
or, alternatively
$$
left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k + a - a,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {, - a,} } left( a right)^{,overline {,k + a,} }
$$
In both versions it is not possible to simply relate the above results with $a^{,overline {,k ,} }$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
We have that
$$
{}_1F_1 (a + b,2a,x) = sumlimits_{0, le ,k} {{{left( {a + b} right)^{,overline {,k,} } } over {left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } }}{{x^{,k} } over {k!}}}
$$
where the exponent overlined is a way to indicate the Rising Factorial or Pochammer symbol.
Now, the denominator equals
$$
eqalign{
& left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = prodlimits_{0, le ,j, le ,k - 1} {left( {2a + j} right)} = cr
& = prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {2a + 2j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {2a + 1 + 2j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {a + j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {a + 1/2 + j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} a^{,overline {,leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil ,} } left( {a + 1/2} right)^{,overline {,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor ,} } cr}
$$
or, alternatively
$$
left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k + a - a,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {, - a,} } left( a right)^{,overline {,k + a,} }
$$
In both versions it is not possible to simply relate the above results with $a^{,overline {,k ,} }$.
We have that
$$
{}_1F_1 (a + b,2a,x) = sumlimits_{0, le ,k} {{{left( {a + b} right)^{,overline {,k,} } } over {left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } }}{{x^{,k} } over {k!}}}
$$
where the exponent overlined is a way to indicate the Rising Factorial or Pochammer symbol.
Now, the denominator equals
$$
eqalign{
& left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = prodlimits_{0, le ,j, le ,k - 1} {left( {2a + j} right)} = cr
& = prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {2a + 2j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {2a + 1 + 2j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{{k - 1} over 2}} rightrfloor = leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil - 1} {left( {a + j} right)}
prodlimits_{0, le ,2j, le ,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor - 1} {left( {a + 1/2 + j} right)} = cr
& = 2^{,k} a^{,overline {,leftlceil {{k over 2}} rightrceil ,} } left( {a + 1/2} right)^{,overline {,leftlfloor {{k over 2}} rightrfloor ,} } cr}
$$
or, alternatively
$$
left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {,k + a - a,} } = left( {2a} right)^{,overline {, - a,} } left( a right)^{,overline {,k + a,} }
$$
In both versions it is not possible to simply relate the above results with $a^{,overline {,k ,} }$.
answered Nov 17 at 23:09
G Cab
16.9k31237
16.9k31237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000812%2fhypergeometric-function-with-special-pochhammer-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I haven't an answer. But have a look at the interesting document url{fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/hyper-published.pdf} around paragraph (4.9). Maybe Kummer's relationship is a step...
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:07
@ Jean Marie:Unfortunately, I did not see anything in this field.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 8:40
Have you had a look at {en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…} ?
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 8:51
Another source again {functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric1F1/…}
– Jean Marie
Nov 16 at 9:01
I did not find anything related.
– Dana
Nov 16 at 14:21