Is there a easy way to put bibliography in a table?











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I would like to know if there exist a bibliography style or if there is a easy way to generate a bibliography that looks like:



enter image description here










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 6:45






  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
    – CarLaTeX
    Nov 16 at 6:46






  • 6




    My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
    – Johannes_B
    Nov 16 at 7:02






  • 1




    @Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16










  • @CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I would like to know if there exist a bibliography style or if there is a easy way to generate a bibliography that looks like:



enter image description here










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 6:45






  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
    – CarLaTeX
    Nov 16 at 6:46






  • 6




    My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
    – Johannes_B
    Nov 16 at 7:02






  • 1




    @Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16










  • @CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16













up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I would like to know if there exist a bibliography style or if there is a easy way to generate a bibliography that looks like:



enter image description here










share|improve this question













I would like to know if there exist a bibliography style or if there is a easy way to generate a bibliography that looks like:



enter image description here







tables bibliographies






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 16 at 6:38









pin_ftv

434




434








  • 1




    Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 6:45






  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
    – CarLaTeX
    Nov 16 at 6:46






  • 6




    My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
    – Johannes_B
    Nov 16 at 7:02






  • 1




    @Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16










  • @CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16














  • 1




    Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 6:45






  • 1




    Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
    – CarLaTeX
    Nov 16 at 6:46






  • 6




    My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
    – Johannes_B
    Nov 16 at 7:02






  • 1




    @Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16










  • @CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:16








1




1




Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
– moewe
Nov 16 at 6:45




Bibliographies like the one shown are certainly very rare (almost non-existent) in scholarly works. For starters, the table does not contain the usual minimal information for a bibliography (which would also include year and at least one of publisher and location; for @articles you would definitely the journal and volume etc.) Secondly, most bibliographies in TeX don't use tables, instead they use lists.
– moewe
Nov 16 at 6:45




1




1




Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
– CarLaTeX
Nov 16 at 6:46




Welcome to TeX.SE! Start from this: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/332710/… and edit your post adding a minimal working example with bibliography (MWEB).
– CarLaTeX
Nov 16 at 6:46




6




6




My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
– Johannes_B
Nov 16 at 7:02




My personal advice: don't do it. It is very ugly.
– Johannes_B
Nov 16 at 7:02




1




1




@Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:16




@Johannes_B and moewe: I don't like that kind of bibliography style either, but it is a requirement. Sincerely I would done it in another way too.
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:16












@CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:16




@CarLaTeX I didn't find any minimal working example while googling so I thought it makes no sense to add a working example of some other bibliography style that doesn't match at all that what I need. Instead I tried to put a graphic so that it will be clearer. Thank you all!
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote



accepted










With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.



For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.



Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{biblatex-ext-tabular}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}

newcolumntype{L}[1]{%
>{raggedrightletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}
newcolumntype{C}[1]{%
>{centeringletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}

defbibtabular{bibtabular}
{setlength{LTpre}{0pt}%
setlength{LTpost}{0pt}%
renewcommand*{arraystretch}{2}%
begin{longtable}{%
@{}
C{dimexpr0.08textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.6textwidth-2tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.3textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
@{}}
toprule
textbf{Ref.} & textbf{Title} & textbf{Author}\
midrule}
{bottomrule
end{longtable}}
{anchorlang{%
printtext[labelnumberwidth]{%
printfield{labelprefix}%
printfield{labelnumber}}}
& plainlang{usebibmacro{title}}
& plainlang{printnames{author}} \}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibtabular
end{document}


Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.





Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

DeclareNameWrapperAlias{author}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{editor}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{translator}{sortname}

DeclareNameWrapperFormat{sortname}{mkbibbold{#1}}

begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibliography
end{document}


Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.






share|improve this answer























  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:18






  • 1




    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 7:20











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460245%2fis-there-a-easy-way-to-put-bibliography-in-a-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
13
down vote



accepted










With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.



For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.



Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{biblatex-ext-tabular}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}

newcolumntype{L}[1]{%
>{raggedrightletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}
newcolumntype{C}[1]{%
>{centeringletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}

defbibtabular{bibtabular}
{setlength{LTpre}{0pt}%
setlength{LTpost}{0pt}%
renewcommand*{arraystretch}{2}%
begin{longtable}{%
@{}
C{dimexpr0.08textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.6textwidth-2tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.3textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
@{}}
toprule
textbf{Ref.} & textbf{Title} & textbf{Author}\
midrule}
{bottomrule
end{longtable}}
{anchorlang{%
printtext[labelnumberwidth]{%
printfield{labelprefix}%
printfield{labelnumber}}}
& plainlang{usebibmacro{title}}
& plainlang{printnames{author}} \}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibtabular
end{document}


Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.





Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

DeclareNameWrapperAlias{author}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{editor}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{translator}{sortname}

DeclareNameWrapperFormat{sortname}{mkbibbold{#1}}

begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibliography
end{document}


Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.






share|improve this answer























  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:18






  • 1




    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 7:20















up vote
13
down vote



accepted










With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.



For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.



Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{biblatex-ext-tabular}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}

newcolumntype{L}[1]{%
>{raggedrightletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}
newcolumntype{C}[1]{%
>{centeringletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}

defbibtabular{bibtabular}
{setlength{LTpre}{0pt}%
setlength{LTpost}{0pt}%
renewcommand*{arraystretch}{2}%
begin{longtable}{%
@{}
C{dimexpr0.08textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.6textwidth-2tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.3textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
@{}}
toprule
textbf{Ref.} & textbf{Title} & textbf{Author}\
midrule}
{bottomrule
end{longtable}}
{anchorlang{%
printtext[labelnumberwidth]{%
printfield{labelprefix}%
printfield{labelnumber}}}
& plainlang{usebibmacro{title}}
& plainlang{printnames{author}} \}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibtabular
end{document}


Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.





Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

DeclareNameWrapperAlias{author}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{editor}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{translator}{sortname}

DeclareNameWrapperFormat{sortname}{mkbibbold{#1}}

begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibliography
end{document}


Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.






share|improve this answer























  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:18






  • 1




    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 7:20













up vote
13
down vote



accepted







up vote
13
down vote



accepted






With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.



For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.



Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{biblatex-ext-tabular}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}

newcolumntype{L}[1]{%
>{raggedrightletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}
newcolumntype{C}[1]{%
>{centeringletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}

defbibtabular{bibtabular}
{setlength{LTpre}{0pt}%
setlength{LTpost}{0pt}%
renewcommand*{arraystretch}{2}%
begin{longtable}{%
@{}
C{dimexpr0.08textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.6textwidth-2tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.3textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
@{}}
toprule
textbf{Ref.} & textbf{Title} & textbf{Author}\
midrule}
{bottomrule
end{longtable}}
{anchorlang{%
printtext[labelnumberwidth]{%
printfield{labelprefix}%
printfield{labelnumber}}}
& plainlang{usebibmacro{title}}
& plainlang{printnames{author}} \}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibtabular
end{document}


Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.





Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

DeclareNameWrapperAlias{author}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{editor}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{translator}{sortname}

DeclareNameWrapperFormat{sortname}{mkbibbold{#1}}

begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibliography
end{document}


Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.






share|improve this answer














With biblatex-ext's package biblatex-ext-tabular you can create tabular bibliographies like the ones in tabular bibliography with biblatex, in fact the code is largely inspired by Audrey's work in that question. You will need at least version 0.5 of biblatex-ext and you can read more about tabular bibliographies in §6 Tabular Bibliographies of its documentation.



For a simple three-column set-up with label, title and author you don't need a lot of code. But you should be aware of the fact that this information alone is not always enough to properly identify a work. @collections don't have authors, they have editors. Even @books usually have more information in the bibliography than just the title and author: the year of publication is present in almost all styles and at least one of publisher or location is very common. @articles would generally need at least a journal and a publication date. The situation is worse for other contained works like @incollection which may be next to impossible to find without knowing the enclosing work.



Not only does this not look very pretty, it is almost certainly not enough information for a proper bibliography. – Don't do this.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{biblatex-ext-tabular}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}

newcolumntype{L}[1]{%
>{raggedrightletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}
newcolumntype{C}[1]{%
>{centeringletnewline\arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}p{#1}}

defbibtabular{bibtabular}
{setlength{LTpre}{0pt}%
setlength{LTpost}{0pt}%
renewcommand*{arraystretch}{2}%
begin{longtable}{%
@{}
C{dimexpr0.08textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.6textwidth-2tabcolseprelax}
L{dimexpr0.3textwidth-tabcolseprelax}
@{}}
toprule
textbf{Ref.} & textbf{Title} & textbf{Author}\
midrule}
{bottomrule
end{longtable}}
{anchorlang{%
printtext[labelnumberwidth]{%
printfield{labelprefix}%
printfield{labelnumber}}}
& plainlang{usebibmacro{title}}
& plainlang{printnames{author}} \}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibtabular
end{document}


Tabular bibliography with label number, title and author.





Compare this with the usual output of a numeric bibliography. If you want to put additional emphasis on the author name, you can make it bold.



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

DeclareNameWrapperAlias{author}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{editor}{sortname}
DeclareNameWrapperAlias{translator}{sortname}

DeclareNameWrapperFormat{sortname}{mkbibbold{#1}}

begin{document}
cite{worman,geer,nussbaum,companion}
printbibliography
end{document}


Usual list bibliography with bold author names so they stand out more.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 16 at 7:27

























answered Nov 16 at 7:08









moewe

83k8106317




83k8106317












  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:18






  • 1




    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 7:20


















  • thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
    – pin_ftv
    Nov 16 at 7:18






  • 1




    @pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
    – moewe
    Nov 16 at 7:20
















thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:18




thank you!! that's what I was looking for but unfortunately I couldn't find any reference to that package while googling.
– pin_ftv
Nov 16 at 7:18




1




1




@pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
– moewe
Nov 16 at 7:20




@pin_ftv It is still fairly new.
– moewe
Nov 16 at 7:20


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460245%2fis-there-a-easy-way-to-put-bibliography-in-a-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What is the Guru Parampara of Kashmiri Shaivism?

Герой Советского Союза

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure