Is $f(x) = frac{1}{x}$ uniformly continuous on $(1, infty)$? [closed]











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












is the function $f(x) = 1/x$ uniformly continuous on $(1, infty)?$ I know that it is not uniformly continuous on $(0, infty)$, but now I'm restricting it even more to get rid of most of the bad parts. I think the answer is yes.










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs Nov 16 at 23:41


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    It is. ${}{}{}{}$
    – T. Bongers
    Nov 16 at 18:48






  • 1




    Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 16 at 18:51








  • 1




    Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
    – Clayton
    Nov 16 at 18:57






  • 1




    Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Nov 16 at 19:32










  • @LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
    – Shalop
    Nov 16 at 23:06















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












is the function $f(x) = 1/x$ uniformly continuous on $(1, infty)?$ I know that it is not uniformly continuous on $(0, infty)$, but now I'm restricting it even more to get rid of most of the bad parts. I think the answer is yes.










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs Nov 16 at 23:41


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    It is. ${}{}{}{}$
    – T. Bongers
    Nov 16 at 18:48






  • 1




    Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 16 at 18:51








  • 1




    Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
    – Clayton
    Nov 16 at 18:57






  • 1




    Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Nov 16 at 19:32










  • @LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
    – Shalop
    Nov 16 at 23:06













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











is the function $f(x) = 1/x$ uniformly continuous on $(1, infty)?$ I know that it is not uniformly continuous on $(0, infty)$, but now I'm restricting it even more to get rid of most of the bad parts. I think the answer is yes.










share|cite|improve this question















is the function $f(x) = 1/x$ uniformly continuous on $(1, infty)?$ I know that it is not uniformly continuous on $(0, infty)$, but now I'm restricting it even more to get rid of most of the bad parts. I think the answer is yes.







real-analysis uniform-continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 19:37









José Carlos Santos

141k19111207




141k19111207










asked Nov 16 at 18:48









joseph

1068




1068




closed as off-topic by Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs Nov 16 at 23:41


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs Nov 16 at 23:41


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Servaes, Nosrati, RRL, Trevor Gunn, Gibbs

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    It is. ${}{}{}{}$
    – T. Bongers
    Nov 16 at 18:48






  • 1




    Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 16 at 18:51








  • 1




    Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
    – Clayton
    Nov 16 at 18:57






  • 1




    Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Nov 16 at 19:32










  • @LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
    – Shalop
    Nov 16 at 23:06














  • 2




    It is. ${}{}{}{}$
    – T. Bongers
    Nov 16 at 18:48






  • 1




    Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 16 at 18:51








  • 1




    Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
    – Clayton
    Nov 16 at 18:57






  • 1




    Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
    – Daniel Schepler
    Nov 16 at 19:32










  • @LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
    – Shalop
    Nov 16 at 23:06








2




2




It is. ${}{}{}{}$
– T. Bongers
Nov 16 at 18:48




It is. ${}{}{}{}$
– T. Bongers
Nov 16 at 18:48




1




1




Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 16 at 18:51






Very roughly, "uniformly continuous" means "having bounded derivative".
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 16 at 18:51






1




1




Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
– Clayton
Nov 16 at 18:57




Indeed, the function $f(x)=1/x$ will be uniformly continuous on any interval of the form $(varepsilon,infty)$ for any $varepsilon>0$. The failure to be uniformly continuous only happens in a neighborhood of $0$, so if you prevent the variable from being able to get too close, you ensure uniform continuity (see Lord Shark the Unknown's comment, too).
– Clayton
Nov 16 at 18:57




1




1




Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 at 19:32




Though as a caution on taking Lord Shark the Unknown's comment too literally - for example, $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ and $f(x) = x sin(1/x)$ are both uniformly continuous on $(0,1)$ even though the derivative is unbounded in both cases.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 at 19:32












@LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
– Shalop
Nov 16 at 23:06




@LordSharktheUnknown NO! Roughly, “having bounded derivative” is equivalent to being Lipchitz. Uniform continuity is a much weaker condition, as Daniel points out and can be made precise using holder or sobolev spaces for instance.
– Shalop
Nov 16 at 23:06










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










If $x,yin(1,infty)$, then$$leftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert=frac{lvert x-yrvert}{xy}<lvert x-yrvert.$$So, for each $varepsilon>0$, just take $delta=varepsilon$ and$$lvert x-yrvert<deltaimpliesleftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert<varepsilon.$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    $f$ is differentiable at $(1,+infty)$ and



    $$|f'(x)|=|frac{-1}{x^2}|le 1$$



    $$f' text{ is bounded } implies$$
    $$f text{ is Lipschitz} implies$$
    $$f text{ is uniformly continuous}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      6
      down vote



      accepted










      If $x,yin(1,infty)$, then$$leftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert=frac{lvert x-yrvert}{xy}<lvert x-yrvert.$$So, for each $varepsilon>0$, just take $delta=varepsilon$ and$$lvert x-yrvert<deltaimpliesleftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert<varepsilon.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        6
        down vote



        accepted










        If $x,yin(1,infty)$, then$$leftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert=frac{lvert x-yrvert}{xy}<lvert x-yrvert.$$So, for each $varepsilon>0$, just take $delta=varepsilon$ and$$lvert x-yrvert<deltaimpliesleftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert<varepsilon.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted






          If $x,yin(1,infty)$, then$$leftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert=frac{lvert x-yrvert}{xy}<lvert x-yrvert.$$So, for each $varepsilon>0$, just take $delta=varepsilon$ and$$lvert x-yrvert<deltaimpliesleftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert<varepsilon.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          If $x,yin(1,infty)$, then$$leftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert=frac{lvert x-yrvert}{xy}<lvert x-yrvert.$$So, for each $varepsilon>0$, just take $delta=varepsilon$ and$$lvert x-yrvert<deltaimpliesleftlvertfrac1x-frac1yrightrvert<varepsilon.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 16 at 18:57









          José Carlos Santos

          141k19111207




          141k19111207






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              $f$ is differentiable at $(1,+infty)$ and



              $$|f'(x)|=|frac{-1}{x^2}|le 1$$



              $$f' text{ is bounded } implies$$
              $$f text{ is Lipschitz} implies$$
              $$f text{ is uniformly continuous}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                $f$ is differentiable at $(1,+infty)$ and



                $$|f'(x)|=|frac{-1}{x^2}|le 1$$



                $$f' text{ is bounded } implies$$
                $$f text{ is Lipschitz} implies$$
                $$f text{ is uniformly continuous}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  $f$ is differentiable at $(1,+infty)$ and



                  $$|f'(x)|=|frac{-1}{x^2}|le 1$$



                  $$f' text{ is bounded } implies$$
                  $$f text{ is Lipschitz} implies$$
                  $$f text{ is uniformly continuous}.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $f$ is differentiable at $(1,+infty)$ and



                  $$|f'(x)|=|frac{-1}{x^2}|le 1$$



                  $$f' text{ is bounded } implies$$
                  $$f text{ is Lipschitz} implies$$
                  $$f text{ is uniformly continuous}.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 16 at 19:35









                  hamam_Abdallah

                  36.8k21533




                  36.8k21533















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                      How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                      QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater