Probability of finding specific set of coloured balls within larger set of random-drawn balls











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












In this question I was helped with calculating the probability of drawing specific set of M coloured balls from a set of N coloured balls.



Now I am looking for a solution for an extended problem: what is the probability of finding my specific set of M balls among Q balls (where Q > M), drawn from the same pool of N balls.



For example: there are 100 balls in the box: 50 red, 30 blue and 20 white. I randomly draw (without replacement) 15 balls from the box. What is the probability of finding among them a set of 6 balls, where 2 of them are red, 2 blue and 2 white?



Using the variables:
N = 100: n1 = 50, n2 = 30, n3 = 20
M = 6: m1 = 2, m2 = 2, m3 = 2
Q = 15


While there are methods how to calculate the result for any specific input values, I am looking for a universal algorithm that would give result for any input values. Right now, I find it hard how to make a jump from the simpler problem of drawing exactly M balls: while it feels there should be some kind of multiplier that corrects for the extra freedom of drawing additional Q-M balls, this surely is not simple one, because these extra balls can themselves contain the set M, or there is partial overlapping, so there should be some smart way how to deduct all those duplicate combinations.



Edit: complemented with empirical data from virtual experiment.



I went forward to build a program to perform virtual experiments. Of course, computer random generators are not true random, but that's the best I have and for the sake of this experiment, I think, they are random enough.



So, I created the pool: a set of 2 red, 3 blue and 4 white balls. My sample size is 6 balls, and I consider the sampling a success, if it contains (at least) 1 red, 1 blue and 1 white ball. Running the simulation one million times I get probability of 90.4858%. That does not necessarily exactly matches the calculated probability (whatever it is), but should be pretty close. So, I'd expect that the formula gives such result, given the input parameters.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    In this question I was helped with calculating the probability of drawing specific set of M coloured balls from a set of N coloured balls.



    Now I am looking for a solution for an extended problem: what is the probability of finding my specific set of M balls among Q balls (where Q > M), drawn from the same pool of N balls.



    For example: there are 100 balls in the box: 50 red, 30 blue and 20 white. I randomly draw (without replacement) 15 balls from the box. What is the probability of finding among them a set of 6 balls, where 2 of them are red, 2 blue and 2 white?



    Using the variables:
    N = 100: n1 = 50, n2 = 30, n3 = 20
    M = 6: m1 = 2, m2 = 2, m3 = 2
    Q = 15


    While there are methods how to calculate the result for any specific input values, I am looking for a universal algorithm that would give result for any input values. Right now, I find it hard how to make a jump from the simpler problem of drawing exactly M balls: while it feels there should be some kind of multiplier that corrects for the extra freedom of drawing additional Q-M balls, this surely is not simple one, because these extra balls can themselves contain the set M, or there is partial overlapping, so there should be some smart way how to deduct all those duplicate combinations.



    Edit: complemented with empirical data from virtual experiment.



    I went forward to build a program to perform virtual experiments. Of course, computer random generators are not true random, but that's the best I have and for the sake of this experiment, I think, they are random enough.



    So, I created the pool: a set of 2 red, 3 blue and 4 white balls. My sample size is 6 balls, and I consider the sampling a success, if it contains (at least) 1 red, 1 blue and 1 white ball. Running the simulation one million times I get probability of 90.4858%. That does not necessarily exactly matches the calculated probability (whatever it is), but should be pretty close. So, I'd expect that the formula gives such result, given the input parameters.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      In this question I was helped with calculating the probability of drawing specific set of M coloured balls from a set of N coloured balls.



      Now I am looking for a solution for an extended problem: what is the probability of finding my specific set of M balls among Q balls (where Q > M), drawn from the same pool of N balls.



      For example: there are 100 balls in the box: 50 red, 30 blue and 20 white. I randomly draw (without replacement) 15 balls from the box. What is the probability of finding among them a set of 6 balls, where 2 of them are red, 2 blue and 2 white?



      Using the variables:
      N = 100: n1 = 50, n2 = 30, n3 = 20
      M = 6: m1 = 2, m2 = 2, m3 = 2
      Q = 15


      While there are methods how to calculate the result for any specific input values, I am looking for a universal algorithm that would give result for any input values. Right now, I find it hard how to make a jump from the simpler problem of drawing exactly M balls: while it feels there should be some kind of multiplier that corrects for the extra freedom of drawing additional Q-M balls, this surely is not simple one, because these extra balls can themselves contain the set M, or there is partial overlapping, so there should be some smart way how to deduct all those duplicate combinations.



      Edit: complemented with empirical data from virtual experiment.



      I went forward to build a program to perform virtual experiments. Of course, computer random generators are not true random, but that's the best I have and for the sake of this experiment, I think, they are random enough.



      So, I created the pool: a set of 2 red, 3 blue and 4 white balls. My sample size is 6 balls, and I consider the sampling a success, if it contains (at least) 1 red, 1 blue and 1 white ball. Running the simulation one million times I get probability of 90.4858%. That does not necessarily exactly matches the calculated probability (whatever it is), but should be pretty close. So, I'd expect that the formula gives such result, given the input parameters.










      share|cite|improve this question















      In this question I was helped with calculating the probability of drawing specific set of M coloured balls from a set of N coloured balls.



      Now I am looking for a solution for an extended problem: what is the probability of finding my specific set of M balls among Q balls (where Q > M), drawn from the same pool of N balls.



      For example: there are 100 balls in the box: 50 red, 30 blue and 20 white. I randomly draw (without replacement) 15 balls from the box. What is the probability of finding among them a set of 6 balls, where 2 of them are red, 2 blue and 2 white?



      Using the variables:
      N = 100: n1 = 50, n2 = 30, n3 = 20
      M = 6: m1 = 2, m2 = 2, m3 = 2
      Q = 15


      While there are methods how to calculate the result for any specific input values, I am looking for a universal algorithm that would give result for any input values. Right now, I find it hard how to make a jump from the simpler problem of drawing exactly M balls: while it feels there should be some kind of multiplier that corrects for the extra freedom of drawing additional Q-M balls, this surely is not simple one, because these extra balls can themselves contain the set M, or there is partial overlapping, so there should be some smart way how to deduct all those duplicate combinations.



      Edit: complemented with empirical data from virtual experiment.



      I went forward to build a program to perform virtual experiments. Of course, computer random generators are not true random, but that's the best I have and for the sake of this experiment, I think, they are random enough.



      So, I created the pool: a set of 2 red, 3 blue and 4 white balls. My sample size is 6 balls, and I consider the sampling a success, if it contains (at least) 1 red, 1 blue and 1 white ball. Running the simulation one million times I get probability of 90.4858%. That does not necessarily exactly matches the calculated probability (whatever it is), but should be pretty close. So, I'd expect that the formula gives such result, given the input parameters.







      combinatorics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:20









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Mar 10 '13 at 19:45









      Passiday

      1406




      1406






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          What you need is called hypergeometric probability. There are totally $binom{100}{15}$ of selecting 15 balls out of 100. You want 6 balls divided into three subsets with specific (color) properties and the rest (15-6) you don't care what properties they have. Since you sample without replacement and experiments are independent you get
          $$
          P(X)= frac{binom{50}{2} cdot binom{30}{2} cdot binom{20}{2} cdotbinom{100-6}{15-6}}{binom{100}{15}}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 20:58










          • If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
            – Alex
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:02










          • I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:36












          • Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
            – Passiday
            Mar 16 '13 at 22:44










          • You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
            – Alex
            Mar 17 '13 at 0:40











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f326770%2fprobability-of-finding-specific-set-of-coloured-balls-within-larger-set-of-rando%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          What you need is called hypergeometric probability. There are totally $binom{100}{15}$ of selecting 15 balls out of 100. You want 6 balls divided into three subsets with specific (color) properties and the rest (15-6) you don't care what properties they have. Since you sample without replacement and experiments are independent you get
          $$
          P(X)= frac{binom{50}{2} cdot binom{30}{2} cdot binom{20}{2} cdotbinom{100-6}{15-6}}{binom{100}{15}}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 20:58










          • If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
            – Alex
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:02










          • I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:36












          • Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
            – Passiday
            Mar 16 '13 at 22:44










          • You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
            – Alex
            Mar 17 '13 at 0:40















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          What you need is called hypergeometric probability. There are totally $binom{100}{15}$ of selecting 15 balls out of 100. You want 6 balls divided into three subsets with specific (color) properties and the rest (15-6) you don't care what properties they have. Since you sample without replacement and experiments are independent you get
          $$
          P(X)= frac{binom{50}{2} cdot binom{30}{2} cdot binom{20}{2} cdotbinom{100-6}{15-6}}{binom{100}{15}}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 20:58










          • If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
            – Alex
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:02










          • I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:36












          • Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
            – Passiday
            Mar 16 '13 at 22:44










          • You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
            – Alex
            Mar 17 '13 at 0:40













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          What you need is called hypergeometric probability. There are totally $binom{100}{15}$ of selecting 15 balls out of 100. You want 6 balls divided into three subsets with specific (color) properties and the rest (15-6) you don't care what properties they have. Since you sample without replacement and experiments are independent you get
          $$
          P(X)= frac{binom{50}{2} cdot binom{30}{2} cdot binom{20}{2} cdotbinom{100-6}{15-6}}{binom{100}{15}}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          What you need is called hypergeometric probability. There are totally $binom{100}{15}$ of selecting 15 balls out of 100. You want 6 balls divided into three subsets with specific (color) properties and the rest (15-6) you don't care what properties they have. Since you sample without replacement and experiments are independent you get
          $$
          P(X)= frac{binom{50}{2} cdot binom{30}{2} cdot binom{20}{2} cdotbinom{100-6}{15-6}}{binom{100}{15}}
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 10 '13 at 19:53









          Alex

          14.2k42133




          14.2k42133












          • Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 20:58










          • If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
            – Alex
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:02










          • I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:36












          • Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
            – Passiday
            Mar 16 '13 at 22:44










          • You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
            – Alex
            Mar 17 '13 at 0:40


















          • Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 20:58










          • If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
            – Alex
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:02










          • I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
            – Passiday
            Mar 10 '13 at 21:36












          • Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
            – Passiday
            Mar 16 '13 at 22:44










          • You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
            – Alex
            Mar 17 '13 at 0:40
















          Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
          – Passiday
          Mar 10 '13 at 20:58




          Is it really so simple that the multiplier is the binomial coefficient (N-M, Q-M)? I was worried that this would result in several distinct combinations of Q balls registered more than once: think about it: if we label all the 100 balls with id numbers, we can imagine set of 12 balls: RED1, RED2, BLUE3, BLUE4, WHITE5, WHITE6, RED7, RED8, BLUE9, BLUE10, WHITE11 and WHITE12. This is one unique combination of 12 drawn balls, but it contains actually several distinct sets of 2/2/2 balls. Shouldn't that cause the number in numerator decrease?
          – Passiday
          Mar 10 '13 at 20:58












          If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
          – Alex
          Mar 10 '13 at 21:02




          If I understood your question correctly, you want two balls from each of 3 subsets (white, blue, red) and you 'don't care' of the rest. Since there are no other colors in the box, you have only these three options for the 'don't care' subset in the sample
          – Alex
          Mar 10 '13 at 21:02












          I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
          – Passiday
          Mar 10 '13 at 21:36






          I'll try to say it in other words. The denumerator describes the total number of unique sets of 15 balls, whatever colour, drawn from the pool of 100 balls. The numerator should describe the total number of unique sets of 15 balls that contain my preferred set of 6 balls. Isn't it that identical sets (R1, R2)(B3, B4)(W5, W6)(R7, R8, B9, B10, W11, W12, R13, R14, R15) and (R7, R8)(B9, B10)(W11, W12)(R1, R2, B3, B4, W5, W6, R13, R14, R15) will be counted as distinct?
          – Passiday
          Mar 10 '13 at 21:36














          Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
          – Passiday
          Mar 16 '13 at 22:44




          Actually, if my calculation is correct, the formula in your example gives absurd probability of 425.1 ie, that means that in the numerator each unique sample is registered on average at least 425 times.
          – Passiday
          Mar 16 '13 at 22:44












          You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
          – Alex
          Mar 17 '13 at 0:40




          You are right. Probably my mistake is that the remaining 9 balls are also selected from the set of R, W and B. In such case I'm not sure how to interpret the problem-there are no other sets these 9 balls can come from
          – Alex
          Mar 17 '13 at 0:40


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f326770%2fprobability-of-finding-specific-set-of-coloured-balls-within-larger-set-of-rando%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater