Given Two-dimensional Gaussian distribution, how to derive the pdf of Z?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(X,Y) sim N left(
begin{pmatrix}0\0
end{pmatrix},
begin{pmatrix} 1& 0 \
0 & 1
end{pmatrix}
right)$
and $Z = X I {XY >0} - X I {XY <0} $



Find the distribution of Z.



From the question, I only know that X,Y are independent and X~N(0,1), Y~N(0,1). I think we should derive the cdf of Z for z>0 and z<0 first in order to get the pdf of Z. However, I don't know how to, since Z=X for XY>0 and Z=-X for XY<0, which is really complicate. Somebody help me please!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
    – leonbloy
    Nov 16 at 21:50

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(X,Y) sim N left(
begin{pmatrix}0\0
end{pmatrix},
begin{pmatrix} 1& 0 \
0 & 1
end{pmatrix}
right)$
and $Z = X I {XY >0} - X I {XY <0} $



Find the distribution of Z.



From the question, I only know that X,Y are independent and X~N(0,1), Y~N(0,1). I think we should derive the cdf of Z for z>0 and z<0 first in order to get the pdf of Z. However, I don't know how to, since Z=X for XY>0 and Z=-X for XY<0, which is really complicate. Somebody help me please!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
    – leonbloy
    Nov 16 at 21:50















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $(X,Y) sim N left(
begin{pmatrix}0\0
end{pmatrix},
begin{pmatrix} 1& 0 \
0 & 1
end{pmatrix}
right)$
and $Z = X I {XY >0} - X I {XY <0} $



Find the distribution of Z.



From the question, I only know that X,Y are independent and X~N(0,1), Y~N(0,1). I think we should derive the cdf of Z for z>0 and z<0 first in order to get the pdf of Z. However, I don't know how to, since Z=X for XY>0 and Z=-X for XY<0, which is really complicate. Somebody help me please!










share|cite|improve this question















Let $(X,Y) sim N left(
begin{pmatrix}0\0
end{pmatrix},
begin{pmatrix} 1& 0 \
0 & 1
end{pmatrix}
right)$
and $Z = X I {XY >0} - X I {XY <0} $



Find the distribution of Z.



From the question, I only know that X,Y are independent and X~N(0,1), Y~N(0,1). I think we should derive the cdf of Z for z>0 and z<0 first in order to get the pdf of Z. However, I don't know how to, since Z=X for XY>0 and Z=-X for XY<0, which is really complicate. Somebody help me please!







probability statistics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 21:49









leonbloy

39.7k645106




39.7k645106










asked Nov 16 at 21:42









Araceli

61




61












  • Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
    – leonbloy
    Nov 16 at 21:50




















  • Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
    – leonbloy
    Nov 16 at 21:50


















Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
– leonbloy
Nov 16 at 21:50






Hi Araceli, welcome to MSE. I wrote down the problem statement in Latex (as you should here), please check that it's ok.
– leonbloy
Nov 16 at 21:50












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










There are several ways...



For example : Let $W=I{X Y ge 0 }$. Notice (show) that $P(W=0) = P(W=1)=frac12$ and (important, and not so trivial) $W$ is independent of $X$.



$$begin{align}P(Zle z) &= P(Z le z cap W=0) + P(Z le z cap W=1) \
&= P(Z le z mid W=0) P(W=0) + P(Z le z mid W=1)P(W=1)\
&= P(X le z mid W=0) frac12 + P(-X le z mid W=1)frac12\
&= P(X le z ) frac12 + P(X ge -z )frac12\
&= frac12 ( F_X(z ) + (1- F_X(-z))\
&= F_X(z )
end{align}$$



That $W$ is independent of $X$ is intuitive by symmetry. A little more formally:
$$P(W=1 | X=x) =begin{cases}
P(Yge 0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x ge 0\
P(Y<0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x < 0\
end{cases}$$

Hence $P(W | X) = P(W)$ , and $W,X$ are independent.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
    – Araceli
    Nov 16 at 23:54










  • @Araceli I added a possible explanation
    – leonbloy
    Nov 17 at 2:44











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001669%2fgiven-two-dimensional-gaussian-distribution-how-to-derive-the-pdf-of-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










There are several ways...



For example : Let $W=I{X Y ge 0 }$. Notice (show) that $P(W=0) = P(W=1)=frac12$ and (important, and not so trivial) $W$ is independent of $X$.



$$begin{align}P(Zle z) &= P(Z le z cap W=0) + P(Z le z cap W=1) \
&= P(Z le z mid W=0) P(W=0) + P(Z le z mid W=1)P(W=1)\
&= P(X le z mid W=0) frac12 + P(-X le z mid W=1)frac12\
&= P(X le z ) frac12 + P(X ge -z )frac12\
&= frac12 ( F_X(z ) + (1- F_X(-z))\
&= F_X(z )
end{align}$$



That $W$ is independent of $X$ is intuitive by symmetry. A little more formally:
$$P(W=1 | X=x) =begin{cases}
P(Yge 0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x ge 0\
P(Y<0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x < 0\
end{cases}$$

Hence $P(W | X) = P(W)$ , and $W,X$ are independent.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
    – Araceli
    Nov 16 at 23:54










  • @Araceli I added a possible explanation
    – leonbloy
    Nov 17 at 2:44















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










There are several ways...



For example : Let $W=I{X Y ge 0 }$. Notice (show) that $P(W=0) = P(W=1)=frac12$ and (important, and not so trivial) $W$ is independent of $X$.



$$begin{align}P(Zle z) &= P(Z le z cap W=0) + P(Z le z cap W=1) \
&= P(Z le z mid W=0) P(W=0) + P(Z le z mid W=1)P(W=1)\
&= P(X le z mid W=0) frac12 + P(-X le z mid W=1)frac12\
&= P(X le z ) frac12 + P(X ge -z )frac12\
&= frac12 ( F_X(z ) + (1- F_X(-z))\
&= F_X(z )
end{align}$$



That $W$ is independent of $X$ is intuitive by symmetry. A little more formally:
$$P(W=1 | X=x) =begin{cases}
P(Yge 0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x ge 0\
P(Y<0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x < 0\
end{cases}$$

Hence $P(W | X) = P(W)$ , and $W,X$ are independent.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
    – Araceli
    Nov 16 at 23:54










  • @Araceli I added a possible explanation
    – leonbloy
    Nov 17 at 2:44













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






There are several ways...



For example : Let $W=I{X Y ge 0 }$. Notice (show) that $P(W=0) = P(W=1)=frac12$ and (important, and not so trivial) $W$ is independent of $X$.



$$begin{align}P(Zle z) &= P(Z le z cap W=0) + P(Z le z cap W=1) \
&= P(Z le z mid W=0) P(W=0) + P(Z le z mid W=1)P(W=1)\
&= P(X le z mid W=0) frac12 + P(-X le z mid W=1)frac12\
&= P(X le z ) frac12 + P(X ge -z )frac12\
&= frac12 ( F_X(z ) + (1- F_X(-z))\
&= F_X(z )
end{align}$$



That $W$ is independent of $X$ is intuitive by symmetry. A little more formally:
$$P(W=1 | X=x) =begin{cases}
P(Yge 0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x ge 0\
P(Y<0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x < 0\
end{cases}$$

Hence $P(W | X) = P(W)$ , and $W,X$ are independent.






share|cite|improve this answer














There are several ways...



For example : Let $W=I{X Y ge 0 }$. Notice (show) that $P(W=0) = P(W=1)=frac12$ and (important, and not so trivial) $W$ is independent of $X$.



$$begin{align}P(Zle z) &= P(Z le z cap W=0) + P(Z le z cap W=1) \
&= P(Z le z mid W=0) P(W=0) + P(Z le z mid W=1)P(W=1)\
&= P(X le z mid W=0) frac12 + P(-X le z mid W=1)frac12\
&= P(X le z ) frac12 + P(X ge -z )frac12\
&= frac12 ( F_X(z ) + (1- F_X(-z))\
&= F_X(z )
end{align}$$



That $W$ is independent of $X$ is intuitive by symmetry. A little more formally:
$$P(W=1 | X=x) =begin{cases}
P(Yge 0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x ge 0\
P(Y<0)=frac12 & {rm if hskip 3mm} x < 0\
end{cases}$$

Hence $P(W | X) = P(W)$ , and $W,X$ are independent.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 17 at 2:43

























answered Nov 16 at 22:03









leonbloy

39.7k645106




39.7k645106












  • Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
    – Araceli
    Nov 16 at 23:54










  • @Araceli I added a possible explanation
    – leonbloy
    Nov 17 at 2:44


















  • Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
    – Araceli
    Nov 16 at 23:54










  • @Araceli I added a possible explanation
    – leonbloy
    Nov 17 at 2:44
















Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
– Araceli
Nov 16 at 23:54




Thanks for answering! That's very helpful. However, I'm still a little bit confused about whether W and X are independent. My thought is that whether xy are positive or negative has nothing to do with the distribution of f(x). Do you have a better explanation?
– Araceli
Nov 16 at 23:54












@Araceli I added a possible explanation
– leonbloy
Nov 17 at 2:44




@Araceli I added a possible explanation
– leonbloy
Nov 17 at 2:44


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001669%2fgiven-two-dimensional-gaussian-distribution-how-to-derive-the-pdf-of-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater