Electron Groups and Platonic Solids











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In my Chemistry class, lately I have been learning about Lewis Structures for molecules, and how the arrangements of groups of electrons on each molecule repel each other to form the molecule into a specific shape. For example, consider the following diagram below of a familiar molecule:



enter image description here



The dots represent electrons, and the dashes represent bonds between atoms, each of which contains two electrons.



One might think that this molecule should assume a straight, linear shape with one $H$ atom on each side, but because each bond (the short lines) consists of electrons, the two electron pairs above $O$ repel them, causing the molecule to bend into this shape. Now consider this smelly example:



enter image description here



Each bond consists of electrons with equal charges, so they will all repel each other with forces that vary equally based on the distance between each respective bond. Thus, they will tend towards a shape that maximizes the distance between each respective bond in the molecule, and this shape turns out to be a tetrahedron (with $C$ at the center and $H$ at the vertices). Another example is the following:



enter image description here



Each of the bonds and $Cl$ atoms, containing electrons, will repel each other, and try to assume a position of maximum pairwise distance. As with the previous example, they will assume a uniform "lattice-like" distribution about the sphere, which, for $6$ atoms, turns into an octahedron.





Now I begin leave the realm of chemistry and enter the realm of spherical geometry and pure mathematics. When there are $4$ outer atoms, they will distribute themselves uniformly about the sphere with radius equal to the bond length centered at the central atom, forming the platonic solid with $4$ vertices, or the tetrahedron. When there are $6$ it forms the platonic solid with $6$ vertices, or the octahedron. Though I'm not sure this can happen in real life, it doesn't take much imagination to guess that if we had $8$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of a cube, and if we had $12$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of an icosahedron (and for $20$ outer atoms, a dodecahedron, of course).



QUESTION: What if there were $7$ outer molecules? Or $9$? Or some other number that is not equal to the number of vertices of any platonic solid?



Formulated mathematically (and borrowing some equations from physics), this question is:




Suppose that $n$ points are distributed around a sphere such that for any of these points $X$, the vectors pointing from each of the other $n-1$ point towards $X$, each with magnitude equal to a constant times the reciprocal of the squared distance between $X$ and the respective point, have a sum equal to a normal vector of the sphere. How can these points be distributed for an arbitrary value of $nne 4,6,8,12,20$?











share|cite|improve this question
























  • socratic.org/questions/…
    – Andrei
    Nov 16 at 22:50






  • 1




    Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 16 at 23:04










  • @PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
    – Frpzzd
    Nov 16 at 23:05








  • 1




    For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 23:18










  • Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
    – Narlin
    Nov 17 at 4:37















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In my Chemistry class, lately I have been learning about Lewis Structures for molecules, and how the arrangements of groups of electrons on each molecule repel each other to form the molecule into a specific shape. For example, consider the following diagram below of a familiar molecule:



enter image description here



The dots represent electrons, and the dashes represent bonds between atoms, each of which contains two electrons.



One might think that this molecule should assume a straight, linear shape with one $H$ atom on each side, but because each bond (the short lines) consists of electrons, the two electron pairs above $O$ repel them, causing the molecule to bend into this shape. Now consider this smelly example:



enter image description here



Each bond consists of electrons with equal charges, so they will all repel each other with forces that vary equally based on the distance between each respective bond. Thus, they will tend towards a shape that maximizes the distance between each respective bond in the molecule, and this shape turns out to be a tetrahedron (with $C$ at the center and $H$ at the vertices). Another example is the following:



enter image description here



Each of the bonds and $Cl$ atoms, containing electrons, will repel each other, and try to assume a position of maximum pairwise distance. As with the previous example, they will assume a uniform "lattice-like" distribution about the sphere, which, for $6$ atoms, turns into an octahedron.





Now I begin leave the realm of chemistry and enter the realm of spherical geometry and pure mathematics. When there are $4$ outer atoms, they will distribute themselves uniformly about the sphere with radius equal to the bond length centered at the central atom, forming the platonic solid with $4$ vertices, or the tetrahedron. When there are $6$ it forms the platonic solid with $6$ vertices, or the octahedron. Though I'm not sure this can happen in real life, it doesn't take much imagination to guess that if we had $8$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of a cube, and if we had $12$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of an icosahedron (and for $20$ outer atoms, a dodecahedron, of course).



QUESTION: What if there were $7$ outer molecules? Or $9$? Or some other number that is not equal to the number of vertices of any platonic solid?



Formulated mathematically (and borrowing some equations from physics), this question is:




Suppose that $n$ points are distributed around a sphere such that for any of these points $X$, the vectors pointing from each of the other $n-1$ point towards $X$, each with magnitude equal to a constant times the reciprocal of the squared distance between $X$ and the respective point, have a sum equal to a normal vector of the sphere. How can these points be distributed for an arbitrary value of $nne 4,6,8,12,20$?











share|cite|improve this question
























  • socratic.org/questions/…
    – Andrei
    Nov 16 at 22:50






  • 1




    Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 16 at 23:04










  • @PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
    – Frpzzd
    Nov 16 at 23:05








  • 1




    For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 23:18










  • Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
    – Narlin
    Nov 17 at 4:37













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











In my Chemistry class, lately I have been learning about Lewis Structures for molecules, and how the arrangements of groups of electrons on each molecule repel each other to form the molecule into a specific shape. For example, consider the following diagram below of a familiar molecule:



enter image description here



The dots represent electrons, and the dashes represent bonds between atoms, each of which contains two electrons.



One might think that this molecule should assume a straight, linear shape with one $H$ atom on each side, but because each bond (the short lines) consists of electrons, the two electron pairs above $O$ repel them, causing the molecule to bend into this shape. Now consider this smelly example:



enter image description here



Each bond consists of electrons with equal charges, so they will all repel each other with forces that vary equally based on the distance between each respective bond. Thus, they will tend towards a shape that maximizes the distance between each respective bond in the molecule, and this shape turns out to be a tetrahedron (with $C$ at the center and $H$ at the vertices). Another example is the following:



enter image description here



Each of the bonds and $Cl$ atoms, containing electrons, will repel each other, and try to assume a position of maximum pairwise distance. As with the previous example, they will assume a uniform "lattice-like" distribution about the sphere, which, for $6$ atoms, turns into an octahedron.





Now I begin leave the realm of chemistry and enter the realm of spherical geometry and pure mathematics. When there are $4$ outer atoms, they will distribute themselves uniformly about the sphere with radius equal to the bond length centered at the central atom, forming the platonic solid with $4$ vertices, or the tetrahedron. When there are $6$ it forms the platonic solid with $6$ vertices, or the octahedron. Though I'm not sure this can happen in real life, it doesn't take much imagination to guess that if we had $8$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of a cube, and if we had $12$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of an icosahedron (and for $20$ outer atoms, a dodecahedron, of course).



QUESTION: What if there were $7$ outer molecules? Or $9$? Or some other number that is not equal to the number of vertices of any platonic solid?



Formulated mathematically (and borrowing some equations from physics), this question is:




Suppose that $n$ points are distributed around a sphere such that for any of these points $X$, the vectors pointing from each of the other $n-1$ point towards $X$, each with magnitude equal to a constant times the reciprocal of the squared distance between $X$ and the respective point, have a sum equal to a normal vector of the sphere. How can these points be distributed for an arbitrary value of $nne 4,6,8,12,20$?











share|cite|improve this question















In my Chemistry class, lately I have been learning about Lewis Structures for molecules, and how the arrangements of groups of electrons on each molecule repel each other to form the molecule into a specific shape. For example, consider the following diagram below of a familiar molecule:



enter image description here



The dots represent electrons, and the dashes represent bonds between atoms, each of which contains two electrons.



One might think that this molecule should assume a straight, linear shape with one $H$ atom on each side, but because each bond (the short lines) consists of electrons, the two electron pairs above $O$ repel them, causing the molecule to bend into this shape. Now consider this smelly example:



enter image description here



Each bond consists of electrons with equal charges, so they will all repel each other with forces that vary equally based on the distance between each respective bond. Thus, they will tend towards a shape that maximizes the distance between each respective bond in the molecule, and this shape turns out to be a tetrahedron (with $C$ at the center and $H$ at the vertices). Another example is the following:



enter image description here



Each of the bonds and $Cl$ atoms, containing electrons, will repel each other, and try to assume a position of maximum pairwise distance. As with the previous example, they will assume a uniform "lattice-like" distribution about the sphere, which, for $6$ atoms, turns into an octahedron.





Now I begin leave the realm of chemistry and enter the realm of spherical geometry and pure mathematics. When there are $4$ outer atoms, they will distribute themselves uniformly about the sphere with radius equal to the bond length centered at the central atom, forming the platonic solid with $4$ vertices, or the tetrahedron. When there are $6$ it forms the platonic solid with $6$ vertices, or the octahedron. Though I'm not sure this can happen in real life, it doesn't take much imagination to guess that if we had $8$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of a cube, and if we had $12$ outer atoms, it would assume the shape of an icosahedron (and for $20$ outer atoms, a dodecahedron, of course).



QUESTION: What if there were $7$ outer molecules? Or $9$? Or some other number that is not equal to the number of vertices of any platonic solid?



Formulated mathematically (and borrowing some equations from physics), this question is:




Suppose that $n$ points are distributed around a sphere such that for any of these points $X$, the vectors pointing from each of the other $n-1$ point towards $X$, each with magnitude equal to a constant times the reciprocal of the squared distance between $X$ and the respective point, have a sum equal to a normal vector of the sphere. How can these points be distributed for an arbitrary value of $nne 4,6,8,12,20$?








optimization vectors spherical-geometry chemistry platonic-solids






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 23:06

























asked Nov 16 at 22:40









Frpzzd

20.1k638103




20.1k638103












  • socratic.org/questions/…
    – Andrei
    Nov 16 at 22:50






  • 1




    Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 16 at 23:04










  • @PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
    – Frpzzd
    Nov 16 at 23:05








  • 1




    For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 23:18










  • Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
    – Narlin
    Nov 17 at 4:37


















  • socratic.org/questions/…
    – Andrei
    Nov 16 at 22:50






  • 1




    Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 16 at 23:04










  • @PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
    – Frpzzd
    Nov 16 at 23:05








  • 1




    For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 23:18










  • Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
    – Narlin
    Nov 17 at 4:37
















socratic.org/questions/…
– Andrei
Nov 16 at 22:50




socratic.org/questions/…
– Andrei
Nov 16 at 22:50




1




1




Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 23:04




Do I understand correctly that we have points $x_1,dots,x_n in S^2$ and $c > 0$ such that for each $y in S^2 setminus { x_1,dots,x_n }$ with the property $lVert y - x_i rVert = c lVert y - x_i rVert^{-2}$ (i.e. $lVert y - x_i rVert^3 =c$) for $i =1,dots,n$, we have $s(y) = sum_{i=1}^n (y - x_i) ne 0$? Note that any $s ne 0$ is a normal vector of $S^2$.
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 23:04












@PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
– Frpzzd
Nov 16 at 23:05






@PaulFrost No, $yin{x_1,x_2,...,x_n}$, not its complement. I will clarify.
– Frpzzd
Nov 16 at 23:05






1




1




For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 23:18




For $n < 4$, things are simple (just put them equally spaced on a circle). You might want to read this: I suspect that the answer to your question is either "they can't" or "exactly the solutions to the Thompson problem", with the difference being a matter of subtleties of wording. If that's so, then for $n = 5$, the answer is apparently a triangular dipyramid.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 23:18












Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
– Narlin
Nov 17 at 4:37




Although 7 is hard to think about, 8 is not as obvious as a cube. Take a look a the picture here
– Narlin
Nov 17 at 4:37















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001719%2felectron-groups-and-platonic-solids%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001719%2felectron-groups-and-platonic-solids%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater