A relation between self-paired orbitals of a group action and its associated permutation representation
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.
I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.
This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.
Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.
If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.
I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.
This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.
Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.
If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.
I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.
This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.
Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.
If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory
Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.
I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.
This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.
Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.
If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory
asked Nov 16 at 21:45
Rijubrata
254
254
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001671%2fa-relation-between-self-paired-orbitals-of-a-group-action-and-its-associated-per%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown