A relation between self-paired orbitals of a group action and its associated permutation representation











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.



I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.



This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.



Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.



If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.



Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.



    I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.



    This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.



    Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.



    If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.



    Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.



      I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.



      This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.



      Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.



      If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.



      Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $G$ be a finite group. Suppose $G$ acts on a finite set $X$. Consider the permutation representaion or character associated with the action, call it $pi$. Since permutation character is the character of a real representation , any irreducible of type -1, must appear in it with even multiplicity. In particular we see that all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1.



      I mention here, that type -1, type 1, refers to the Frobenius-Schur index. Also , by a orbital, we mean that orbits of the action of $G$ on $Xtimes X$, which is naturally defined using $G$ acting on $X$. Also self-paired orbital $Delta$ is one in which $(a,b)in Delta implies (b,a)in Delta$.



      This is a paragraph from the book "Permutation Groups", by Peter Cameron( Pg-46). I don't understand the claims in the paragraph. First of all why should a character of type -1, must occur even number of times.



      Next, I also don't understand why all the orbitals are self-paired if and only if all the irreducibles in $pi$ are of type 1 and multiplicity 1. I have proved one part of this.



      If $pi=sum_{chi in Irr(G)} m_{chi}chi$, we have that number of self-paired orbitals $s= frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G} pi(g^{2}) = sum_{chi in Irr(G)} epsilon_{chi}m_{chi}$, where $epsilon_{chi}$ is the Frobenius-Schur index of $chi$. Let $r$ be the total number of orbitals of the action. Now, Let us assume that all the irreducible characters in $pi$ are of multplicity 1 and type 1. Let us assume there are $k$ irreducible constituents of $pi$. Then by the above formula, $s=k$. Also $langle pi, pi rangle= sum_{chi in Irr(G)}m_{chi}^{2}=k$. So $langle pi, pi rangle=s$. But, $langle pi, pi rangle=r$, is a standard result and henceforth, $r=s$, and so all are self-paired orbitals. But I couldn't determine the other direction.



      Thanks in advance for any kind of help!!!







      abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 16 at 21:45









      Rijubrata

      254




      254



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001671%2fa-relation-between-self-paired-orbitals-of-a-group-action-and-its-associated-per%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001671%2fa-relation-between-self-paired-orbitals-of-a-group-action-and-its-associated-per%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater