matrices and determinant
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $Ain mathcal{M}_{n,p}(mathbb{R})$ and $G={}^{t!}AA$
We assume that $operatorname{rk}(A)=p$
To show that $det(G)>0$ the argument provided is $det G=(det A)^2>0$, unfortunately I don't understand, because for me this argument holds only if $Ain mathcal{M}_{p}(mathbb{R})$ (a square matrix)
linear-algebra determinant
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $Ain mathcal{M}_{n,p}(mathbb{R})$ and $G={}^{t!}AA$
We assume that $operatorname{rk}(A)=p$
To show that $det(G)>0$ the argument provided is $det G=(det A)^2>0$, unfortunately I don't understand, because for me this argument holds only if $Ain mathcal{M}_{p}(mathbb{R})$ (a square matrix)
linear-algebra determinant
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
1
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
2
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $Ain mathcal{M}_{n,p}(mathbb{R})$ and $G={}^{t!}AA$
We assume that $operatorname{rk}(A)=p$
To show that $det(G)>0$ the argument provided is $det G=(det A)^2>0$, unfortunately I don't understand, because for me this argument holds only if $Ain mathcal{M}_{p}(mathbb{R})$ (a square matrix)
linear-algebra determinant
Let $Ain mathcal{M}_{n,p}(mathbb{R})$ and $G={}^{t!}AA$
We assume that $operatorname{rk}(A)=p$
To show that $det(G)>0$ the argument provided is $det G=(det A)^2>0$, unfortunately I don't understand, because for me this argument holds only if $Ain mathcal{M}_{p}(mathbb{R})$ (a square matrix)
linear-algebra determinant
linear-algebra determinant
edited Nov 16 at 22:20
egreg
174k1383198
174k1383198
asked Nov 16 at 22:03
Stu
1,1011313
1,1011313
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
1
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
2
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24
|
show 2 more comments
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
1
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
2
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
1
1
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
2
2
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The expression $(det A)^2$ indeed doesn't make sense because $A$ is not necessarily square. As pointed out in a comment, you may use Cauchy-Binet formula to prove the statement. Alternatively, as $A$ has full column rank, if $xinmathbb R^p$ is nonzero, then $Axne0$ and $x^TGx=x^TA^TAx=|Ax|^2>0$. Therefore $G$ is symmetric positive definite and it has a positive determinant.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The expression $(det A)^2$ indeed doesn't make sense because $A$ is not necessarily square. As pointed out in a comment, you may use Cauchy-Binet formula to prove the statement. Alternatively, as $A$ has full column rank, if $xinmathbb R^p$ is nonzero, then $Axne0$ and $x^TGx=x^TA^TAx=|Ax|^2>0$. Therefore $G$ is symmetric positive definite and it has a positive determinant.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The expression $(det A)^2$ indeed doesn't make sense because $A$ is not necessarily square. As pointed out in a comment, you may use Cauchy-Binet formula to prove the statement. Alternatively, as $A$ has full column rank, if $xinmathbb R^p$ is nonzero, then $Axne0$ and $x^TGx=x^TA^TAx=|Ax|^2>0$. Therefore $G$ is symmetric positive definite and it has a positive determinant.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The expression $(det A)^2$ indeed doesn't make sense because $A$ is not necessarily square. As pointed out in a comment, you may use Cauchy-Binet formula to prove the statement. Alternatively, as $A$ has full column rank, if $xinmathbb R^p$ is nonzero, then $Axne0$ and $x^TGx=x^TA^TAx=|Ax|^2>0$. Therefore $G$ is symmetric positive definite and it has a positive determinant.
The expression $(det A)^2$ indeed doesn't make sense because $A$ is not necessarily square. As pointed out in a comment, you may use Cauchy-Binet formula to prove the statement. Alternatively, as $A$ has full column rank, if $xinmathbb R^p$ is nonzero, then $Axne0$ and $x^TGx=x^TA^TAx=|Ax|^2>0$. Therefore $G$ is symmetric positive definite and it has a positive determinant.
answered Nov 17 at 1:45
user1551
70.5k566125
70.5k566125
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001688%2fmatrices-and-determinant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$G$ doesn't make sense... I'm not familiar with putting the transpose on the left of the matrix. Do you mean $G=A^tA$? Also how do you know that $det(A)neq 0$? Finally, what is your question?
– Squirtle
Nov 16 at 22:06
What is $rg(A)$?
– Robert Lewis
Nov 16 at 22:13
1
sorry but $$rg(A)=p$$
– Stu
Nov 16 at 22:14
Google "Cauchy-Binet identity".
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 22:14
2
@Stu The statement is false, unless you assume $nle p$. For $n>p$, the matrix $G$ is not invertible, so its determinant is $0$. If the rank of $A$ is $p$ and $nle p$, then $G$ is indeed invertible.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 22:24