Solution to constrained quadratic optimization problem
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there a closed form solution to this constrained quadratic optimization problem?
$$
mathrm{argmax}_X mathrm{Tr}(AX)mathrm{Tr}(BX)\
0preceq Xpreceq I
$$
Where $A$ and $B$ are hermitian positive matrices and $Apreceq I$, $Bpreceq I$.
EDIT: The inequalities are with respect to the eigenvalues
convex-optimization
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there a closed form solution to this constrained quadratic optimization problem?
$$
mathrm{argmax}_X mathrm{Tr}(AX)mathrm{Tr}(BX)\
0preceq Xpreceq I
$$
Where $A$ and $B$ are hermitian positive matrices and $Apreceq I$, $Bpreceq I$.
EDIT: The inequalities are with respect to the eigenvalues
convex-optimization
1
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there a closed form solution to this constrained quadratic optimization problem?
$$
mathrm{argmax}_X mathrm{Tr}(AX)mathrm{Tr}(BX)\
0preceq Xpreceq I
$$
Where $A$ and $B$ are hermitian positive matrices and $Apreceq I$, $Bpreceq I$.
EDIT: The inequalities are with respect to the eigenvalues
convex-optimization
Is there a closed form solution to this constrained quadratic optimization problem?
$$
mathrm{argmax}_X mathrm{Tr}(AX)mathrm{Tr}(BX)\
0preceq Xpreceq I
$$
Where $A$ and $B$ are hermitian positive matrices and $Apreceq I$, $Bpreceq I$.
EDIT: The inequalities are with respect to the eigenvalues
convex-optimization
convex-optimization
edited Nov 16 at 16:30
Brian Borchers
5,51611119
5,51611119
asked Nov 16 at 16:17
Ziofil
571416
571416
1
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28
add a comment |
1
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28
1
1
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001331%2fsolution-to-constrained-quadratic-optimization-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
By $leq$, do you mean element wise inequality or conic inequality with respect to the semidefinite cone?
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:23
Thank you for the question, see edit.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:25
The notation $succeq$ is normally used for this kind of conic inequality.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 16 at 16:26
Fixed. Thank you.
– Ziofil
Nov 16 at 16:28