Converge or diverge? $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {(ln n)^a}{n^b}$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Converge or diverge? $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {(ln n)^a}{n^b}$, $a > 0, b > 1$.
How do you approach this? Since every criteria I know gives $1$. What should I do?
$lim_{ntoinfty} frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = 1.$
$lim_{ntoinfty} (a_n)^{frac 1n} = 1.$
I think this should converge for every $a,b$ with the restriction in hypothesis, right?
sequences-and-series convergence divergence
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Converge or diverge? $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {(ln n)^a}{n^b}$, $a > 0, b > 1$.
How do you approach this? Since every criteria I know gives $1$. What should I do?
$lim_{ntoinfty} frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = 1.$
$lim_{ntoinfty} (a_n)^{frac 1n} = 1.$
I think this should converge for every $a,b$ with the restriction in hypothesis, right?
sequences-and-series convergence divergence
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Converge or diverge? $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {(ln n)^a}{n^b}$, $a > 0, b > 1$.
How do you approach this? Since every criteria I know gives $1$. What should I do?
$lim_{ntoinfty} frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = 1.$
$lim_{ntoinfty} (a_n)^{frac 1n} = 1.$
I think this should converge for every $a,b$ with the restriction in hypothesis, right?
sequences-and-series convergence divergence
Converge or diverge? $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {(ln n)^a}{n^b}$, $a > 0, b > 1$.
How do you approach this? Since every criteria I know gives $1$. What should I do?
$lim_{ntoinfty} frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = 1.$
$lim_{ntoinfty} (a_n)^{frac 1n} = 1.$
I think this should converge for every $a,b$ with the restriction in hypothesis, right?
sequences-and-series convergence divergence
sequences-and-series convergence divergence
asked Nov 15 at 15:18
C. Cristi
1,449218
1,449218
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday
add a comment |
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Hint Apply the integral test, that is, consider the convergence of $$int_1^{infty} frac{log^a x ,dx}{x^b} = int_0^{infty} u^a e^{(1 - b) u} du .$$
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Write $b=1+2ac$ with $cgt0$. Then show that
$${(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^ato0$$
Remarks (added later): What we're really after is an inequality of the form
$${(ln n)^aover n^b}le{Bover n^{1+p}}$$
for some $pgt0$, in which case the convergence of $sum{1over n^{1+p}}$ guarantees the convergence of $sum{(ln n)^aover n^b}$. So to be explicit, if we write $b=1+2ac$ and $p=ac$ (with $c={b-1over2a}gt0$), then we have
$${(ln n)^a/n^bover1/n^{1+p}}={(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^a=left(ln n^cover cn^cright)^aleleft(1over ce right)^a$$
where we use the fact that $f(x)={ln xover x}$ attains its maximum at $x=e$, where $f(e)={1over e}$. It follows that
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(1over ce right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+ac}}ltinfty$$
where $c={b-1over2a}$. Writing it without the $c$, it's
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(2aover (b-1)e right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+(b-1)/2}}ltinfty$$
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By Cauchy condensation test the condensed series is
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {2^n(ln 2^n)^a}{2^{bn}}=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {n^aln^a 2}{2^{n(b-1)}}$$
which converges for $b>1$.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Hint Apply the integral test, that is, consider the convergence of $$int_1^{infty} frac{log^a x ,dx}{x^b} = int_0^{infty} u^a e^{(1 - b) u} du .$$
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint Apply the integral test, that is, consider the convergence of $$int_1^{infty} frac{log^a x ,dx}{x^b} = int_0^{infty} u^a e^{(1 - b) u} du .$$
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint Apply the integral test, that is, consider the convergence of $$int_1^{infty} frac{log^a x ,dx}{x^b} = int_0^{infty} u^a e^{(1 - b) u} du .$$
Hint Apply the integral test, that is, consider the convergence of $$int_1^{infty} frac{log^a x ,dx}{x^b} = int_0^{infty} u^a e^{(1 - b) u} du .$$
answered Nov 15 at 15:29
Travis
58.7k765142
58.7k765142
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
add a comment |
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
is that looking the same as Gamma Function?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
It can be transformed into an expression involving the Gamma function, yes.
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
(...but one doesn't need to know that to check convergence.)
– Travis
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Write $b=1+2ac$ with $cgt0$. Then show that
$${(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^ato0$$
Remarks (added later): What we're really after is an inequality of the form
$${(ln n)^aover n^b}le{Bover n^{1+p}}$$
for some $pgt0$, in which case the convergence of $sum{1over n^{1+p}}$ guarantees the convergence of $sum{(ln n)^aover n^b}$. So to be explicit, if we write $b=1+2ac$ and $p=ac$ (with $c={b-1over2a}gt0$), then we have
$${(ln n)^a/n^bover1/n^{1+p}}={(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^a=left(ln n^cover cn^cright)^aleleft(1over ce right)^a$$
where we use the fact that $f(x)={ln xover x}$ attains its maximum at $x=e$, where $f(e)={1over e}$. It follows that
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(1over ce right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+ac}}ltinfty$$
where $c={b-1over2a}$. Writing it without the $c$, it's
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(2aover (b-1)e right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+(b-1)/2}}ltinfty$$
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Write $b=1+2ac$ with $cgt0$. Then show that
$${(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^ato0$$
Remarks (added later): What we're really after is an inequality of the form
$${(ln n)^aover n^b}le{Bover n^{1+p}}$$
for some $pgt0$, in which case the convergence of $sum{1over n^{1+p}}$ guarantees the convergence of $sum{(ln n)^aover n^b}$. So to be explicit, if we write $b=1+2ac$ and $p=ac$ (with $c={b-1over2a}gt0$), then we have
$${(ln n)^a/n^bover1/n^{1+p}}={(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^a=left(ln n^cover cn^cright)^aleleft(1over ce right)^a$$
where we use the fact that $f(x)={ln xover x}$ attains its maximum at $x=e$, where $f(e)={1over e}$. It follows that
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(1over ce right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+ac}}ltinfty$$
where $c={b-1over2a}$. Writing it without the $c$, it's
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(2aover (b-1)e right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+(b-1)/2}}ltinfty$$
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Write $b=1+2ac$ with $cgt0$. Then show that
$${(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^ato0$$
Remarks (added later): What we're really after is an inequality of the form
$${(ln n)^aover n^b}le{Bover n^{1+p}}$$
for some $pgt0$, in which case the convergence of $sum{1over n^{1+p}}$ guarantees the convergence of $sum{(ln n)^aover n^b}$. So to be explicit, if we write $b=1+2ac$ and $p=ac$ (with $c={b-1over2a}gt0$), then we have
$${(ln n)^a/n^bover1/n^{1+p}}={(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^a=left(ln n^cover cn^cright)^aleleft(1over ce right)^a$$
where we use the fact that $f(x)={ln xover x}$ attains its maximum at $x=e$, where $f(e)={1over e}$. It follows that
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(1over ce right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+ac}}ltinfty$$
where $c={b-1over2a}$. Writing it without the $c$, it's
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(2aover (b-1)e right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+(b-1)/2}}ltinfty$$
Write $b=1+2ac$ with $cgt0$. Then show that
$${(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^ato0$$
Remarks (added later): What we're really after is an inequality of the form
$${(ln n)^aover n^b}le{Bover n^{1+p}}$$
for some $pgt0$, in which case the convergence of $sum{1over n^{1+p}}$ guarantees the convergence of $sum{(ln n)^aover n^b}$. So to be explicit, if we write $b=1+2ac$ and $p=ac$ (with $c={b-1over2a}gt0$), then we have
$${(ln n)^a/n^bover1/n^{1+p}}={(ln n)^a/n^{1+2ac}over1/n^{1+ac}}=left(ln nover n^cright)^a=left(ln n^cover cn^cright)^aleleft(1over ce right)^a$$
where we use the fact that $f(x)={ln xover x}$ attains its maximum at $x=e$, where $f(e)={1over e}$. It follows that
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(1over ce right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+ac}}ltinfty$$
where $c={b-1over2a}$. Writing it without the $c$, it's
$$sum_{n=1}^infty{(ln n)^aover n^b}leleft(2aover (b-1)e right)^asum_{n=1}^infty{1over n^{1+(b-1)/2}}ltinfty$$
edited yesterday
answered Nov 15 at 15:25
Barry Cipra
58k652121
58k652121
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
add a comment |
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
Woah, woah, slow down, why did you wrote it like that? to get the same power? and also why you need the $c$? Why the $2$? and what is the intuition behind that?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:27
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
And why it is enough to show that it tends to $0$?
– C. Cristi
Nov 15 at 15:28
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I wrote it that way just to make things look nice. It's actually enough to show that the ratio is ultimately bounded, at which point ${(ln n)^aover n^{1+2ac}}lt{Bover n^{1+ac}}$ shows that given series is bounded by a convergent series.
– Barry Cipra
Nov 15 at 17:02
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
I don't think that's enough for me, can you be more explicit?
– C. Cristi
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By Cauchy condensation test the condensed series is
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {2^n(ln 2^n)^a}{2^{bn}}=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {n^aln^a 2}{2^{n(b-1)}}$$
which converges for $b>1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By Cauchy condensation test the condensed series is
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {2^n(ln 2^n)^a}{2^{bn}}=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {n^aln^a 2}{2^{n(b-1)}}$$
which converges for $b>1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
By Cauchy condensation test the condensed series is
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {2^n(ln 2^n)^a}{2^{bn}}=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {n^aln^a 2}{2^{n(b-1)}}$$
which converges for $b>1$.
By Cauchy condensation test the condensed series is
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {2^n(ln 2^n)^a}{2^{bn}}=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac {n^aln^a 2}{2^{n(b-1)}}$$
which converges for $b>1$.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
gimusi
85.9k74294
85.9k74294
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999817%2fconverge-or-diverge-sum-n-1-infty-frac-ln-nanb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hint: For large enough $n$ we have $(ln n)^a<n^{(b-1)/2}$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
yesterday