Compute the cardinality of a field $K$ and show that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.
(a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.
(b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.
(c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.
I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:
(a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,
$$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$
I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that
$$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$
I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and
$$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$
Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.
(b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.
(c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.
$textbf{EDIT:}$
Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:
(b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.
(c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.
abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.
(a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.
(b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.
(c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.
I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:
(a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,
$$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$
I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that
$$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$
I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and
$$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$
Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.
(b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.
(c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.
$textbf{EDIT:}$
Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:
(b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.
(c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.
abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.
(a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.
(b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.
(c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.
I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:
(a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,
$$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$
I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that
$$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$
I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and
$$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$
Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.
(b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.
(c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.
$textbf{EDIT:}$
Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:
(b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.
(c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.
abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field
Let be $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ and $P(X) = X^3 + 2X + 1 in F[X]$.
(a) Let be $alpha$ a root of $P(X)$ on a splitting field of $P(X)$ over $F$ and let be $K = F[alpha]$. Compute the cardinality of $K$.
(b) Prove that $F[beta] = K$ for every $beta in K backslash F$.
(c) Prove that $K$ contains a splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ over $F$.
I would like to know if my solution of item $a$ is correct and some hints on items $b$ and $c$. This is what I thought:
(a) Let be the homomorphism $v_{alpha}: F[X] longrightarrow F[alpha]$ given by $v_{alpha}(P(X)) := P(alpha)$. By the First Isomorphism Theorem,
$$F[X]/ text{Ker} v_{alpha} cong F[alpha]$$
I tried to show that $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (P(X))$. On the one hand $v_{alpha}(P(X)) = P(alpha) = 0$ since $alpha$ is a root of $P(X)$ by hypothesis, then $(P(X)) subset text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. On the other hand, $F = mathbb{Z} / 5 mathbb{Z}$ is a field, therefore $F[X]$ is an Euclidean domain, in particular, it's a Principal Ideal Domain, then $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X))$ for some $A(X) in text{Ker} v_{alpha}$. Applying the Euclide's algorithm for division, exist $Q(X), R(X) in F[X]$ such that
$$A(X) = Q(X)P(X) + R(X), R equiv 0 text{or} text{degree} (R(X)) < text{degree} (P(X)) = 3$$
I know that $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 0,1$, otherwise, $alpha in F$, which is an absurd since $P(X)$ is irreducible in $F[X]$ (it's just apply Eisenstein's criterion for $P(X-1)$ for $p = 3$ to observe this) and $text{degree} (R(X)) neq 2$, otherwise, $alpha^2 in F$, which imply $alpha = alpha^6 = (alpha^2)^3 in F$, which is an absurd for the same reason explained previously, then $P(X)$ divides $A(X)$, therefore $text{Ker} v_{alpha} = (A(X)) subset (P(X))$ and
$$F[X] / (P(X)) cong F[alpha].$$
Looking the quotient, I know that every $R(X) in F[alpha]$ has the form $aX^2 + bX + c$, where $a, b, c in F$, then $|K| = 5^3 = 125$.
(b) Since $beta in K backslash F$ and $F subset F[alpha]$, it's clear that $F[beta] subset F[alpha]$. Observing exist $B(X) = a_n X^n + cdots + a_1 X + a_0$ for some $a_i neq 0$ with $i in { 1, cdots, n }$ such that $beta = B(alpha) = a_n (alpha)^n + cdots + a_1 (alpha) + a_0$ by the fact that $beta in K backslash F$, but I don't know how to use this to show that $alpha in F[beta]$.
(c) I don't sure how to start this exercise, but I imagine that I need use item $b$.
$textbf{EDIT:}$
Following the hints, I tried do the following for items $b$ and $c$:
(b) Since $F[beta]$ it's a subspace of $K$ over $F$, $[F[beta] : F] leq [F[alpha] : F] = 3$. Let be $m_{beta}(X)$ the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$, then $text{degree} (m_{beta}(X)) neq 1$, otherwise, $beta in F$, which is an absurd since $beta in K backslash F$ by hypothesis.
(c) $K - { 0 }$ it's a group with order |K - { 0 }| = 5^3 - 1 = 124. By Sylow's theorem, we ensure the existence and uniqueness of a $31$-Sylow subgroup $S_{31}$ and $S_{31}$ it's a cylic group, therefore exist only one $x in K - { 0 }$ such that $o(x) = 31$, all the roots of $X^{31} - 1$ are in $S_{31} = langle x rangle$, then $K supset K - { 0 } supset langle x rangle$, i.e., $K$ it's a field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$. Since the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$ is the smallest field extension that contains all roots of $X^{31} - 1$, $K$ must be contains the splitting field of $X^{31} - 1$.
abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field
abstract-algebra proof-verification splitting-field
edited Nov 15 at 22:09
asked Nov 15 at 14:04
Math enthusiast
1126
1126
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
$$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.
For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.
Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
$$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.
For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.
Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
$$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.
For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.
Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
$$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.
For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.
Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?
For part a, once you've shown that $P(X)$ is irreducible you can be done rather quickly; you know that $F[X]$ is a principal ideal domain so $ker v_a=(A(X))$ for some $A(X)in F[X]$, and you know that $P(X)inker v_a$ so $P(X)=Q(X)A(X)$ for some $Q(X)in F[X]$. Since $P(X)$ is irreducible it follows that $A(X)=uP(X)$ or $A(X)=u$ for some unit $uin F$. If $A(X)=u$ then
$$ker v_a=(A(X))=(u)=F[X],$$
which is clearly false, so $A(X)=uP(X)$ and hence $ker v_a=(uP(X))=(P(X))$. And then indeed every element of the quotient $F[X]/ker v_a$ is of the form $aX^2+bX+c$, so $|K|=5^3$.
For part b, consider the minimal polynomial of $beta$ over $F$. This is an irreducible polynomial with a zero in $K$, hence its degree is at most $3$. Show that it cannot be less than $3$.
Fort part c, note that $K-{0}$ is a multiplicative (abelian) group of order $5^3-1$. How many elements of order $31$ does it contain?
answered Nov 15 at 14:27
Servaes
20.6k33789
20.6k33789
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
add a comment |
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
I edited my post and tried again following your hints. Can you give me some hint for the reason that $[F[beta] : F] neq 2$ please?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 22:12
1
1
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
One way, in the spirit of part c, is to note that $F[beta]-{0}$ is a multiplicative subgroup of $F[alpha]-{0}$. If $[F[beta]:F]=2$ then $|F[beta]-{0}|=24$, but this does not divide $|F[alpha]-{0}|=124$.
– Servaes
Nov 16 at 12:26
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999744%2fcompute-the-cardinality-of-a-field-k-and-show-that-k-contains-a-splitting-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown