Making diagrams
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
4
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
diagrams
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
edited Nov 16 at 17:54
Sigur
23.3k354135
23.3k354135
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
asked Nov 16 at 17:51
Manoel
1434
1434
4
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39
add a comment |
4
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39
4
4
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
C should be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
C should be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
1
1
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
edited Nov 16 at 21:09
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
answered Nov 16 at 17:56
marmot
78.8k487166
78.8k487166
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
add a comment |
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
Nov 16 at 18:29
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
Nov 16 at 18:30
1
1
I suggest using relative units such as
em or ex.– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
I suggest using relative units such as
em or ex.– egreg
Nov 16 at 21:06
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
Sorry for the basic question, but isn't the relative unit convertible to cm for example in the end?
– Diaa
Nov 18 at 6:00
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
edited Nov 17 at 21:08
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
answered Nov 17 at 13:00
Sebastiano
8,34441754
8,34441754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
1
1
It is not necessary to use
@{->} since it is the standard arrow style.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
It is not necessary to use
@{->} since it is the standard arrow style.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:00
1
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:01
1
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow from
B to C with reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts from C.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow from
B to C with reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts from C.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use
@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use
@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.– Sebastiano
Nov 17 at 21:11
2
2
I don't know the difference between
@C and @C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is @R also.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
I don't know the difference between
@C and @C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is @R also.– Sigur
Nov 17 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
draft saved
draft discarded
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460349%2fmaking-diagrams%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
Nov 16 at 17:53
1
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
Nov 16 at 20:39