How to use static route to connect 2 routers with another router?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 1 router (R1) connected to the internet which has LAN IP 192.168.0.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
I have another router (R2) which is connected from 1 LAN port of R1 to the Internet port of R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.1.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.110 (static)
I also have a third router (R3) which has the same kind of connection as R1 <-> R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.2.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.120 (static)
The 3 routers are placed in 3 houses (next to each other) and I can't make any more physical connection (more cables router from one to another)
My goal is to get the LAN/Wireless network of R2 to talk to the LAN/Wireless network of R3 without using internet, and without any access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1. I also want to keep access to each router's web interface. From what I've read online, static routing is what I need.
What am I supposed to enter in Destination IP, Subnet Mask, Gateway in the Static Routing Table of the 3 routers so that I can make this connection possible ?
This is the Web Interface of R2:
This is the Web Interface of R1/R3:
I'm kind of a beginner at networking so I don't know what a "subnet" is and how to properly set the connection(s).
networking router routing lan
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 1 router (R1) connected to the internet which has LAN IP 192.168.0.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
I have another router (R2) which is connected from 1 LAN port of R1 to the Internet port of R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.1.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.110 (static)
I also have a third router (R3) which has the same kind of connection as R1 <-> R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.2.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.120 (static)
The 3 routers are placed in 3 houses (next to each other) and I can't make any more physical connection (more cables router from one to another)
My goal is to get the LAN/Wireless network of R2 to talk to the LAN/Wireless network of R3 without using internet, and without any access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1. I also want to keep access to each router's web interface. From what I've read online, static routing is what I need.
What am I supposed to enter in Destination IP, Subnet Mask, Gateway in the Static Routing Table of the 3 routers so that I can make this connection possible ?
This is the Web Interface of R2:
This is the Web Interface of R1/R3:
I'm kind of a beginner at networking so I don't know what a "subnet" is and how to properly set the connection(s).
networking router routing lan
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have 1 router (R1) connected to the internet which has LAN IP 192.168.0.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
I have another router (R2) which is connected from 1 LAN port of R1 to the Internet port of R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.1.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.110 (static)
I also have a third router (R3) which has the same kind of connection as R1 <-> R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.2.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.120 (static)
The 3 routers are placed in 3 houses (next to each other) and I can't make any more physical connection (more cables router from one to another)
My goal is to get the LAN/Wireless network of R2 to talk to the LAN/Wireless network of R3 without using internet, and without any access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1. I also want to keep access to each router's web interface. From what I've read online, static routing is what I need.
What am I supposed to enter in Destination IP, Subnet Mask, Gateway in the Static Routing Table of the 3 routers so that I can make this connection possible ?
This is the Web Interface of R2:
This is the Web Interface of R1/R3:
I'm kind of a beginner at networking so I don't know what a "subnet" is and how to properly set the connection(s).
networking router routing lan
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
I have 1 router (R1) connected to the internet which has LAN IP 192.168.0.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0
I have another router (R2) which is connected from 1 LAN port of R1 to the Internet port of R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.1.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.110 (static)
I also have a third router (R3) which has the same kind of connection as R1 <-> R2. This router has LAN IP 192.168.2.1 and Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 and WAN IP: 192.168.0.120 (static)
The 3 routers are placed in 3 houses (next to each other) and I can't make any more physical connection (more cables router from one to another)
My goal is to get the LAN/Wireless network of R2 to talk to the LAN/Wireless network of R3 without using internet, and without any access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1. I also want to keep access to each router's web interface. From what I've read online, static routing is what I need.
What am I supposed to enter in Destination IP, Subnet Mask, Gateway in the Static Routing Table of the 3 routers so that I can make this connection possible ?
This is the Web Interface of R2:
This is the Web Interface of R1/R3:
I'm kind of a beginner at networking so I don't know what a "subnet" is and how to properly set the connection(s).
networking router routing lan
networking router routing lan
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
edited Nov 18 at 5:09
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
asked Nov 17 at 21:15
TermoZour
1122316
1122316
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45
add a comment |
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1376322%2fhow-to-use-static-route-to-connect-2-routers-with-another-router%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you tell us the WAN IP of R2 and R3? I can provide the static routes with this information.
– TDurden
Nov 18 at 4:08
This is a bit more complex than static routes. Assuming these are basic soho routers they are also doing NAT. R2 and R3 networks will not communicate with each other when NAT is in play. Your R1 network is also not protected by anything - it is completely exposed. In fact your R2 and R3 networks are more protected from R1 and each other than the other way around. There is a technical solution to this if someone is willing to teach and describe in detail how to do everything. The better question is, should you?
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 4:50
@TDurden I've added the required information
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
@Appleoddity what do you mean by "your R1 network is also not protected by anything" ? Without considering R2 and R3, wouldn't that be a regular consumer network that almost everyone has ? Also, I can disable NAT on R2, would that help ?
– TermoZour
Nov 18 at 5:24
Your goal is “no access to the LAN/Wireless network of R1.” How do you intend to do that when all traffic has to traverse the R1 network? Yes, it is possible. Right now, R1 is the least protected network in the entire setup you have.
– Appleoddity
Nov 18 at 5:45